We don't know how you interpret "changing", "mind", "think"

For instance, "changing" might imply anything from a reversal to enlarging or 
shrinking, etc.
"Mind" might involve reactive feelings, recalled feelings, new feelings, or 
feelings with any mixture of reasoning, bias, judgment, etc. "Think" could 
refer to anything from associative play to structural analysis of any or all 
parts of an artwork, including any historical and social influences, conscious 
or not.   Taking a of that into consideration I suspect that every moment of 
our lives is changing our minds in some ways.
 
But, knowing from experience that you prefer to keep these things on a very 
simple plane,  I suppose you are telling us what we already know: You have an 
opinion, obtained from forgotten sources and presumed therefore to have been 
born full-blown in your head, and then you look for outer echos of it, praising 
those that harmonize and rejecting those that are discordant.  
wc



________________________________
From: Chris Miller <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 1:06:54 PM
Subject: Changing my mind about the way I look at art

Does anyone else have any personal examples of text changing your mind about
how you think about some artwork, recording, or book?

Has a text ever changed how highly you value any of the above?

I can't think of a single one.

Indeed, it's the usually the other way around -- i.e. my experience with the
artwork affects what I think about a text that refers to it.















*****************************************************************************
*

Thank you for your last response, Imago Asthetik -- I'll respond to it
tomorrow.

Meanwhile, I wonder whether you might elaborate on the following:

"A number of Adornos writings have changed theway I look at art.  I remember
the lists brief discussion of Jay Bernsteins
discussion of Dutch painting, which changed my mind about it.  Greenbergs New
Lacoon prompted me to rethink several points."

Could you fill in some details?


Like "Before I read Jay Bernstein I saw Dutch painting as 'A' -- after I read
it, I saw it as 'B'"

And especially, can you say something like "Before I read Joe Smith I placed
the aesthetic value of X over Y -- but after  I read him, I valued Y or X"


Have your experiences of change  been anything like Michael's ?


He recently wrote:

"Speaking only of my own experience, which I think is pretty universal, I can
grasp and see so much more of any work of art when I have learned more about
its making and its historical and cultural context. I was never much of a fan
of El Greco--too much dark stuff and those elongated figures--until I studied
some art history. Then when I saw my first El Greco (in a big show at the
National Gallery in the 80s, after many of them had been cleaned), they took
my breath away. Gone were my misgivings about the dark, tenebrist palette and
noodly anatomy."

Where it seems that  the books he read gave him permission to ignore certain
questionable misgivings that he had before he saw the actual paintings.



____________________________________________________________
Click now for great quotes on affordable mortgage insurance policies!
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxQwQFx6xpTuoGgSB1qTA6330
ClGavMGqyDl6GRLLw9bSLcGEwcIPe/

Reply via email to