Perhaps you are right, Ms Sullivan. Regardless, one cannot confront a question by launching a salvo of questions instead of developing a particular position, or developing a rigourous critique. I am also dumbstruck by what seems to be Mr Millers disinterest in his own questions: when I asked him to clarify them, he simply moved on to another set -- to wit: a set that seems to be orthogonal to the original ones -- as if he had not inquired after something in the first place.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 4:15 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In a message dated 8/29/09 4:08:07 PM, [email protected] writes: > > > > My sense Mr Miller is that you are now simply avoiding the issues at hand > > (namely whether one can change ones mind about a painting in light of > > aesthetics and art criticism) and asking me questions for no other reason > > than to deflect the discussion. In light of this, I am happy to end it > > here. > > > > Miller may confuse deflecting the discussion with confronting the question > inasmuchas as they both change the discussion path. > Kate Sullivan
