>If some part of an aesthetic judgment of a visual thing relies on seeing, and if all seeing requires "filling in" (and if "filling in" is the same as constructing and "seeing-in" ), then some part of the aesthetic judgment is "filling in". Or, if some A is B, and if all B is C, thus some A is C. (WC)
But can an aesthetic judgment be assembled from its parts? And can anything specific ever be said about part 'C' (filling-in)? If William believes so, then he should be able to provide us with an example from an aesthetic judgment that he has made. But William is rather shy about making judgments because the inevitable conclusion of this analytic approach is that judgments are not better than one another, their parts are just different. Is Jacques Louis David really a better painter than Thomas Kinkade? If so, what details of part 'C' would relate to that judgment? ____________________________________________________________ Click here to find the satellite television package that meets your needs. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxT9QtC1Nf1IYdiyoUeou0Vm6 EPUHBnvKW4fiBJ8wlSI27StIfK5A8/
