>There are cases where photographers were good painters and good painters were good photographers. Your statement is just narrow opinion---completely unsupported by any facts or logic.
But there are no cases where anyone (great painter or not) has controlled a line within a photograph so intensely that we might call it drawn. Of course, that statement remains a matter of perception, which can be the foundation for facts and logic, but cannot be established by them. I see it that way -- apparently, you do not. And this gives me yet another exercise for the Miller test of aesthetic acuity: can the viewer tell the difference between lines made by cameras and those made by brushes, pencils, crayons, or engraving tools. ____________________________________________________________ Make the right decisions about your inheritance. Click here for more information. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxQ00X7sDag7xhwm6I0hNZehc eOwT14bqmqYytqqwYc61pghwVQpaA/
