It may have been a happy accident but it made considerable sense. Kate In a message dated 10/5/09 9:11:33 PM, [email protected] writes:
> Kate, It was happy accident. > Boris > > Please note: message attached > > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected], [email protected] > Subject: Re: Reading Kivy - Chapter One: How we got here and why > Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:55:40 EDT > > The word meaning could be looked from two points. > > One is human/utilitarian, dealing with the present moment's comfort of > > the > > body and mind. From this point meaning of art is not always much > > essential. > > If we think of total existence of substance and states of its orderly > > structure, art has a profound meaning even "nameless". > > Boris Shoshensky > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Reading Kivy - Chapter One: How we got here and why > > Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 07:19:25 -0700 (PDT) > > > > Miller is now suffering from illusions of grandeur when he characterizes > > Bell > > as "amusing or sad, poor" He doesn't understand that any object or > sound > > or > > form is, in itself, without being experien > > > > I think Boris' last sentence:If we think of total existence of substance > and states of its orderly > > structure, art has a profound meaning even "nameless". is important. > > Kate Sullivan
