Wrong. Aesthetic judgment of the artist does. Boris Shoshensky ---------- Original Message ---------- From: armando baeza <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: armando baeza <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Reading Kivy: Chapter Two - Wittgenstein and Weitz Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:31:52 -0700
Aesthetic judgement does not insure good or bad art, just good or bad Aesthetic judgement. mando On Oct 9, 2009, at 10:28 AM, Saul Ostrow wrote: > This may be true as a condition of something being art - but many > things are > made in the name of art that do not meet this standard - unless > you wish to > imply that even bad and derivative art is always one of a kind - in > which case > there is more of the latter than the former as such it being one of > a kind > unique to its maker is no distinction, nor of merit > > > On 10/9/09 12:31 PM, "William Conger" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Aesthetic judgement aside, art is always one of a kind (unique). >> mando > > > -- ____________________________________________________________ Weight Loss Program Best Weight Loss Program - Click Here! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/c?cp=bR9zV1fTwHmzj2bZTB5_JAAAJ1Gc l_zTaptgNR5c8Mer1v9kAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEUgAAAAA=
