Nothing, that is, except your statement. wc
________________________________ From: Boris Shoshensky <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 9:21:49 AM Subject: Re: Reading Kivy: Chapter Two - Wittgenstein and Weitz Nothing Is absolute. ---------- Original Message ---------- From: armando baeza <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: armando baeza <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Reading Kivy: Chapter Two - Wittgenstein and Weitz Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:38:16 -0700 In fact Aesthetic judgement is never as absolute thing. It's just a judgement. mando On Oct 9, 2009, at 11:31 AM, armando baeza wrote: > Aesthetic judgement does not insure good or bad art, > just good or bad Aesthetic judgement. > mando > > On Oct 9, 2009, at 10:28 AM, Saul Ostrow wrote: > >> This may be true as a condition of something being art - but many >> things are >> made in the name of art that do not meet this standard - unless >> you wish to >> imply that even bad and derivative art is always one of a kind - >> in which case >> there is more of the latter than the former as such it being one >> of a kind >> unique to its maker is no distinction, nor of merit >> >> >> On 10/9/09 12:31 PM, "William Conger" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Aesthetic judgement aside, art is always one of a kind (unique). >>> mando >> >> >> -- ____________________________________________________________ Weight Loss Program Best Weight Loss Program - Click Here! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/c?cp=LKqq15PgPriHqNNt-glw7gAAJ1Gc l_zTaptgNR5c8Mer1v9kAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEUgAAAAA=
