Or we can look at it this way - after Picasso and Matisse - traditional skills
were meaningless and - new skills were necessary - and as such Duchamp trumps
Picasso and Matisse who today for many young artist are meaningless


On 3/13/10 3:54 PM, "armando baeza" <[email protected]> wrote:

On Mar 13, 2010, at 10:32 AM, Boris Shoshensky wrote:

> Very true and very sad. By the way Duchamp had good traditional
> skills, but
> not enough talent to compete with Picasso or Matisse, so he went
> down the
> urinal drain. The same with Warhol and Koons.
> Banal manipulations out of helplessness.
> Boris Shoshensky

--

Reply via email to