I would feel a lot better about Berg if he or she actually wrote something and engaged in discussions instead of merely forwarding already published articles. As it is, one can't really respond to the material posted and thus there's really nothing to discuss. What's the point? Any of us can and do find all sorts of material on the web or at the newstands. Re Berg, where's this energy and enthusiasm you speak of? Paul Signac finished his book on George Seurat and Neo-Impressionism with this challenge, "Let the great genius step forth". So I ask Berg to step forth and actually participate in discussion instead of remaining behind the curtain or, I should say, behind the flimsy articles he refers us to. wc
----- Original Message ---- From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, June 25, 2010 10:36:00 PM Subject: Re: "To me, that has always been the essential function of art: To make you attentive." In a message dated 6/25/10 10:29:06 PM, [email protected] writes: > I hate the dumb stuff Berg finds and sticks up on the site. > Understood, William, but every tenth reference is worth something. It's simple enough for you not to open open any of his referrals. He brings benighted but enthusiastic energy.
