He does occasionally find good stuff which has given rise to some discussion, and no, I cannot quote chapter and verse. He doesn't stall useful discussion and he doesn't twit people and while there is a lot of it he can't tell what will be interesting so he has to put it all up. I don't read it all either,but I think he is a useful member of the list. Kate Sullivan In a message dated 6/26/10 10:30:11 AM, [email protected] writes:
> Berg's genius is not manifested in the writing of books or creating art, > but I have more than once been truly impressed with the range and tenacity > of > his "hunting". I know I could not match it. I'm dismayed by the apparent > limitations to his intellect, but I've occasionally felt that dismay about > every single lister who's ever posted on this forum -- including, very > often, > myself. > > Again, this is not to say I see no grounds for your complaint. I also > admire your energy and responsiveness, and I need to accept that it comes > with > -- > and, indeed, to some extent depends on -- what you and I know is your > lively irritability. It's a nuisance to have to restrain one's > responsiveness, > but we all have to sometimes, and I urge you simply to ignore his > postings. I > don't open every one myself (I also admit there are a few too many). But I > have to concede the guy is an ardent and voluminous reader, and I find > I'm > glad to know such folk are out there, hunting. > > In a message dated 6/26/10 9:47:26 AM, [email protected] writes: > > > > I would feel a lot better about Berg if he or she actually wrote > > something and > > engaged in discussions instead of merely forwarding already published > > articles. As it is, one can't really respond to the material posted and > > thus > > there's really nothing to discuss.
