With these lines, Damien Hirst shows that a clear-thinking philosopher he ain't:
"I think anything done super-well is art. And it could be a great meal, or it could be a great meeting." I don't mean I disagree with his judgment about the kinds of things that can "BE" "art". I disagree with the mind that apparently sees no difference between merely CALLING something "art", and asserting a chimerical ontic existence-status. Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2105436,00.html#ixzz1wkPg6sS1
