In a message dated 10/19/12 5:08:16 PM, [email protected] writes:
> I wouldn't say there's any "should" or "shouldn't" for Joseph; I for > one really quite enjoy considering his ill-defined problems. . . . > Cheers; > Chris > Chris was evidently reacting to my line: > Until Joseph > > should usefully describe what notion of "art" (and of "consensus") he > has in > > mind, his question cannot be coped with reasonably. > Chris mistook my 'should'. I wasn't, in that line, saying what Joseph ought or ought not do. I was using the subjunctive mode. "Should Joseph ever describe. . .then his question could be coped with reasonably"
