With the B11, it's sort of a pseudo FDD, it's not real FDD like a
traditional dumb pipe FDD radio that would have latencies of less than 1ms
solid end to end. From 2.5 to 4.5ms and varying depending on which way the
traffic is flowing greatest at any given period in time.

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Dennis Burgess <dmburg...@linktechs.net>
wrote:

> I believe the B11 has a Full duplex mode of operation.  Its 750/750 or
> something like that.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer *
>
> Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
>
> *Link Technologies, Inc* -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
>
> *Office*: 314-735-0270  Website: http://www.linktechs.net
>
> Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
> *Sent:* Monday, July 16, 2018 11:13 PM
> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AF-11FX vs B11
>
>
>
> AF11x by a long shot. They run full duplex for one. They also seem to be a
> lot better in higher noise environments. We don't have any B11s any more.
>
>
>
> bp
>
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
>
> On 7/16/2018 6:02 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:
>
> Does anyone have experience with both of these that can provide some
> guidance as to which has worked better?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to