This brings up what I've been wondering when looking at the AF11 data
sheets:
A Trango Lynx on a 56mhz channel SISO without compression yields 486mbps
Full Duplex at 1024QAM.
An AF11X SISO on the same channel size at 1024QAM yields 344mbps Full
Duplex.
What's the deal? Lower cyclic prefix on AF11?
-Adam
On 7/17/2018 2:28 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
With limited spectrum, it's an accurate statement. On a single
polarity, 56mhz channel an AF-11 will get slightly less throughput
than something like an old SAF Lumina (and the AF11 is using 1024QAM
vs 256QAM, to get not even as much capacity, which means it needs a
higher link budget). However, if spectrum isn't a problem, you need to
spend a lot more money to get similar throughput to either of these
radios with anything else.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Faisal Imtiaz
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> Neither radio has much better performance than a 10 year old
traditional 256 QAM radio.
One should take that with a grain of salt !....
In absolute terms, yes that could be an accurate statement.
How is pans out in reality is questionable !
:)
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
http://www.snappytelecom.net
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Mike Hammett" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Sent: *Tuesday, July 17, 2018 1:36:15 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AF-11FX vs B11
I don't have an incentive to use either as there is so little
11 GHz spectrum in my area.
Neither radio has much better performance than a 10 year old
traditional 256 QAM radio.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Jason McKemie" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Sent: *Tuesday, July 17, 2018 12:32:20 PM
*Subject: *[AFMUG] AF-11FX vs B11
More dependable, predictable, etc.
I take it you like the B11? I like the radio interface and SFP
on that radio, I like just about everything else on the AF11.
I've just read about several instances where people have
replaced the B11 with the AF11fx - I haven't read a single one
the opposite way around. I'd like to hear if you've had a
different experience.
On Tuesday, July 17, 2018, Mike Hammett <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Define "better".
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Jason McKemie" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Sent: *Monday, July 16, 2018 8:02:34 PM
*Subject: *[AFMUG] AF-11FX vs B11
Does anyone have experience with both of these that can
provide some guidance as to which has worked better?
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
<http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
<http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
<http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
<http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
