I don't have an incentive to use either as there is so little 11 GHz spectrum 
in my area. 

Neither radio has much better performance than a 10 year old traditional 256 
QAM radio. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Jason McKemie" <[email protected]> 
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 12:32:20 PM 
Subject: [AFMUG] AF-11FX vs B11 

More dependable, predictable, etc. 


I take it you like the B11? I like the radio interface and SFP on that radio, I 
like just about everything else on the AF11. 


I've just read about several instances where people have replaced the B11 with 
the AF11fx - I haven't read a single one the opposite way around. I'd like to 
hear if you've had a different experience. 

On Tuesday, July 17, 2018, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: 




Define "better". 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 






From: "Jason McKemie" < [email protected] > 
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 8:02:34 PM 
Subject: [AFMUG] AF-11FX vs B11 


Does anyone have experience with both of these that can provide some guidance 
as to which has worked better? 
-- 
AF mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 




-- 
AF mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to