I wouldn't be too sure that was real noise... we had similar issues with our first B11 link (it even showed a ton of noise on the spectrum analyzer), and ended up having to replace the radios. After replacing those first crummy made-in-California radios, with the newer, superior Chinese version.... it worked fine.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:35 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > In San Mateo and Santa Clara valley there are a _LOT_ of 11 GHz paths > criss-crossing all over the place. Like it or not, the noise floor is not > as quiet as you might expect. We first tried the B11 on a link from the > mountain SW of San Mateo shooting to kind of central San Mateo. It was > abysmal. Would not get close to full modulation, and only half duplex; > which is a bigger deal than some think. It also dropped the connection to > almost nothing intermittently. We replaced it with an AF11x, and while it's > not quite getting full modulation, it is darn close. And it stays up, and > it runs full dux. > > 'nuff said. We don't use B11s anymore. > > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 7/17/2018 7:41 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > >> On 7/16/18 9:12 PM, Bill Prince wrote: >> >>> They also seem to be a lot better in higher noise environments. >>> >> >> Um, how are you seeing "higher noise" in a licensed band? >> >> > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
