What does an aviat link cost? The alfoplus2 is about $15k a link, the regular alfoplus used to be a solid deal, not as much anymore.
On Thursday, July 19, 2018, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > SIAE I believe will be your best bang and at a reasonable buck. Aviat, > maybe. Bridgewave, still waiting. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *[email protected] > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Thursday, July 19, 2018 9:43:01 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AF11x > > So what current product current release radio has the best throughput in > the 11 GHz band? > > *From:* Adam Moffett > *Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2018 8:04 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [AFMUG] AF11x > > So I just read up about the AF11x. I haven't been paying much attention > to this product because I've been busy with other things. > > The datasheet claims "best spectral efficiency in class" and "1.2gbps". > Various people on the forum made claims that don't match up with simple > comparisons of spec sheets. Some were UBNT employees, others were just > fanboys. > > The actual info on the spec sheets is that you get about 22% less > throughput per channel at the same modulation level and same channel size > as competing products. They claim huge numbers by adding multiple channels > together. You also can't use a full 80mhz channel, so if I compare to a > PTP820C (which actually *can *do 1.2gbps full duplex in XPIC), the > Airfiber 11x is more like 42% less throughput. > > So the spec sheet is factually accurate with it's numbers, but the text > narrative is clearly intended to mislead the buyer. Having just realized > this, I'm a bit offended. > > It seems the only thing it really has going for it is being very > inexpensive. Like I can get 2 AF11x's for less than one PTP820S with full > speed licenses. So *if *I can get enough channels licensed for 2 XPIC > links, then the AF11x is still compelling. And it might mean I can justify > an 11ghz link for a lower volume site than I could otherwise. They didn't > need to lie about it. > > </grumpyMode> > > ------------------------------ > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
