The 820C does 2048 QAM at 80 MHz. I think their initial release didn’t have it but fairly certain it does now.
Sent from my iPad > On Jul 19, 2018, at 6:05 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah, but who knows when you'll actually be able to get your hands on those > Bridgewave radios... if you need something now, it doesn't really matter if > there's going to be better radios coming out "soon". > > >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote: >> The 820 can’t do 80MHz channels at 2048QAM. The Bridgewave Navigator is >> what I’d be looking at next, way more capabilities and capacity. They are >> just starting to ship them. >> >> >> >> Rory >> >> >> >> From: AF [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie >> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 9:45 AM >> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11x >> >> >> >> What does an aviat link cost? The alfoplus2 is about $15k a link, the >> regular alfoplus used to be a solid deal, not as much anymore. >> >> On Thursday, July 19, 2018, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> SIAE I believe will be your best bang and at a reasonable buck. Aviat, >> maybe. Bridgewave, still waiting. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> >> Midwest Internet Exchange >> >> The Brothers WISP >> >> >> >> >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 9:43:01 AM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11x >> >> So what current product current release radio has the best throughput in the >> 11 GHz band? >> >> >> >> From: Adam Moffett >> >> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 8:04 AM >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> Subject: [AFMUG] AF11x >> >> >> >> So I just read up about the AF11x. I haven't been paying much attention to >> this product because I've been busy with other things. >> >> The datasheet claims "best spectral efficiency in class" and "1.2gbps". >> Various people on the forum made claims that don't match up with simple >> comparisons of spec sheets. Some were UBNT employees, others were just >> fanboys. >> >> The actual info on the spec sheets is that you get about 22% less throughput >> per channel at the same modulation level and same channel size as competing >> products. They claim huge numbers by adding multiple channels together. >> You also can't use a full 80mhz channel, so if I compare to a PTP820C (which >> actually can do 1.2gbps full duplex in XPIC), the Airfiber 11x is more like >> 42% less throughput. >> >> So the spec sheet is factually accurate with it's numbers, but the text >> narrative is clearly intended to mislead the buyer. Having just realized >> this, I'm a bit offended. >> >> It seems the only thing it really has going for it is being very >> inexpensive. Like I can get 2 AF11x's for less than one PTP820S with full >> speed licenses. So if I can get enough channels licensed for 2 XPIC links, >> then the AF11x is still compelling. And it might mean I can justify an >> 11ghz link for a lower volume site than I could otherwise. They didn't need >> to lie about it. >> >> </grumpyMode> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
