Right, as long as you don't need more than that 500-600mbps, and there aren't any issues with licensing both polarities, then it's really hard to justify going with anything other than AF11.
It's when you need more capacity than that, or you have limited spectrum to work that things get more complicated. On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote: > I have to correct my statement, I meant to say: > > Difficult to compete with AF11x about $2200 with antennas and about > 550-600 MBps on a 56 mhz *xpic *channel (using a 80 ghz license). > > > You can achieve 500-600 on a single xpic channel …there is some loss vs a > traditional radio (10-15%) , but the cost benefit is way to big! > > > From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> on behalf of Adam Moffett < > dmmoff...@gmail.com> > > > > *Gino A. Villarini* > President > Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 > > Reply-To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> > Date: Monday, July 23, 2018 at 1:12 PM > To: "af@af.afmug.com" <af@af.afmug.com> > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 11 or 18 > > Wow, I keep accidentally going offlist. The change is harder for me to > get used to than I imagined. > > Anyway their datasheet says something like 350mbps SISO and 700mbs MIMO. > Look carefully. > > > On 7/23/2018 12:41 PM, Gino A. Villarini wrote: > > Difficult to compete with AF11x about $2200 with antennas and about > 550-600 MBps on a 56 mhz channel (using a 80 ghz license). > > Latest firmware has 2046QAM … > > From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> on behalf of Chuck McCown < > ch...@wbmfg.com> > > > > *Gino A. Villarini* > President > Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 > > Reply-To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> > Date: Monday, July 23, 2018 at 12:06 PM > To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 11 or 18 > > Sumbuddy needs to make a spreadsheet.... > > *From:* Gino A. Villarini > *Sent:* Monday, July 23, 2018 10:01 AM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 11 or 18 > > Divide total throughput / cost … > > From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> on behalf of Chuck McCown < > ch...@wbmfg.com> > > > > *Gino A. Villarini* > President > Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 > > Reply-To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> > Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 9:11 PM > To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 11 or 18 > > Just trying to get the highest throughput backhaul for the buck. > > *From:* Eric Kuhnke > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 18, 2018 7:08 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 11 or 18 > > Both are 80 MHz, but the AF11 only uses 56 MHz wide... If you look at the > channel mask from a spectrum analyzer of an expensive carrier type 11 GHz > radio (Dragonwave, Ceragon) it uses nearly all of the 80. > > 18 GHz, 112MHz x dual pol products exist for the ETSI and international > market. > > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> Of course I want to use an AF11X due to the price, but which band has the >> wider channels? >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> > ------------------------------ > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > ------------------------------ > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
