Sorry, I read that backwards. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Jay Weekley" <[email protected]> 
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 1:52:01 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RF Armor for a CPE 

You can load Elevate on a UBNT on a Force 200 and it will connect to a 
UBNT AP? Is the Force 200 a better dish than the Powerbeam? 

Mike Hammett wrote: 
> Sure it will. 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- 
> Mike Hammett 
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> 
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>  
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> 
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>  
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> 
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> 
> 
> 
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> *From: *"Jay Weekley" <[email protected]> 
> *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]> 
> *Sent: *Monday, July 30, 2018 1:36:21 PM 
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RF Armor for a CPE 
> 
> That won't work on a Ubiquiti AP will it? 
> 
> Dave wrote: 
> > Just curious why not a epmp force 200 and load up some elevate? 
> > 
> > 
> > On 07/30/2018 12:51 PM, Jay Weekley wrote: 
> >> Are the Pringles still in it? 
> >> 
> >> Dave wrote: 
> >>> I think I have a pringles can laying around here somewhere you can 
> >>> have :) 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> On 07/27/2018 11:56 AM, Jay Weekley wrote: 
> >>>> This is for a customer that can't keep a stable link with a -54 on 
> >>>> Ubquiti 2.4. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Bill Prince wrote: 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> They leak profusely out the back. The main benefit is to the 
> >>>>> sides. You will get better results if you don't mount them 
> >>>>> back-to-back, but aimed opposite directions & placed side-by-side. 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> bp 
> >>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> On 7/27/2018 8:26 AM, Jay Weekley wrote: 
> >>>>>> How effective is RF Armor in reducing interference being received 
> >>>>>> by an SM? Obviously it depends on which direction it's coming 
> from . 
> >>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>> *Jay Weekley* 
> >>>>>> *Cyber Broadband 
> >>>>>> * 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> -- 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >> 
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> *Jay Weekley* 
> *Cyber Broadband 
> * 
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
*Jay Weekley* 
*Cyber Broadband 
* 

-- 
AF mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to