force 200 is kind of amazing where it works for as exposed as the radio itself is, i wonder if the screw that holds it in deflects back side noise
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 1:25 PM Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > Just curious why not a epmp force 200 and load up some elevate? > > > On 07/30/2018 12:51 PM, Jay Weekley wrote: > > Are the Pringles still in it? > > Dave wrote: > > I think I have a pringles can laying around here somewhere you can have :) > > > On 07/27/2018 11:56 AM, Jay Weekley wrote: > > This is for a customer that can't keep a stable link with a -54 on Ubquiti > 2.4. > > Bill Prince wrote: > > > They leak profusely out the back. The main benefit is to the sides. You > will get better results if you don't mount them back-to-back, but aimed > opposite directions & placed side-by-side. > > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 7/27/2018 8:26 AM, Jay Weekley wrote: > > How effective is RF Armor in reducing interference being received by an > SM? Obviously it depends on which direction it's coming from . > -- > *Jay Weekley* > *Cyber Broadband > * > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > -- > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
