No... you have to use an ePMP AP with elevate. Even if you could do that, I doubt there'd be enough difference to matter.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Jay Weekley <par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: > You can load Elevate on a UBNT on a Force 200 and it will connect to a > UBNT AP? Is the Force 200 a better dish than the Powerbeam? > > Mike Hammett wrote: > >> Sure it will. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+In >> telligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/ >> company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin. >> com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Jay Weekley" <par...@cyberbroadband.net> >> *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com> >> *Sent: *Monday, July 30, 2018 1:36:21 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RF Armor for a CPE >> >> >> That won't work on a Ubiquiti AP will it? >> >> Dave wrote: >> > Just curious why not a epmp force 200 and load up some elevate? >> > >> > >> > On 07/30/2018 12:51 PM, Jay Weekley wrote: >> >> Are the Pringles still in it? >> >> >> >> Dave wrote: >> >>> I think I have a pringles can laying around here somewhere you can >> >>> have :) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 07/27/2018 11:56 AM, Jay Weekley wrote: >> >>>> This is for a customer that can't keep a stable link with a -54 on >> >>>> Ubquiti 2.4. >> >>>> >> >>>> Bill Prince wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> They leak profusely out the back. The main benefit is to the >> >>>>> sides. You will get better results if you don't mount them >> >>>>> back-to-back, but aimed opposite directions & placed side-by-side. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> bp >> >>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On 7/27/2018 8:26 AM, Jay Weekley wrote: >> >>>>>> How effective is RF Armor in reducing interference being received >> >>>>>> by an SM? Obviously it depends on which direction it's coming from >> . >> >>>>>> -- >> >>>>>> *Jay Weekley* >> >>>>>> *Cyber Broadband >> >>>>>> * >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > >> > >> >> -- >> *Jay Weekley* >> *Cyber Broadband >> * >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> >> >> > -- > *Jay Weekley* > *Cyber Broadband > * > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
