I’m not a huge fan of muni broadband for some of the reasons you cite. I was just amazed that he is all for free speech when it meets his goals and then completely against it another circumstance.
Mark > On Oct 31, 2018, at 3:53 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > I actually agreed with the muni wireless and free speech issue. He cited > exact language in the AUPs. Hate speech is hard to define and muni’s should > not have that in their AUPs in my opinion. I also liked that he didn’t think > munis should be able to compete with private sector. > > I am only a socialist when it serves my purposes, at all other times I am a > libertarian... > > From: Mark Radabaugh <> > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 1:49 PM > To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS > > Oh, it’s even better. > > In the same speech where he was railing against municipal broadband on free > speech grounds he was also busy bragging about how tough the FCC is being on > those dastardly free speech pirate radio stations. Because, you know, > pirate radio is obviously the lowest of the scofflaws. How dare someone use > a FM transmitter without a license! The FCC has managed to take a whole > slew of incredibly dangerous pastors broadcasting sermons off the air. > > Mark > >> On Oct 31, 2018, at 3:06 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected] <>> wrote: >> >> True. The Pai FCC and the Trump Administration in general seems dedicated >> to leaving a legacy that can’t easily be undone. Like selling spectrum, or >> appointing Supreme Court Justices. They probably see Wheeler as a fool >> whose accomplishments could be undone with the stroke of a pen, and Obama >> much the same. I’m not being political, and I guess you have to give them >> credit for understanding how the game is played. If you want a legacy that >> lasts longer than the next election, you have to build it with bricks not >> straw. >> >> BTW, did you see where O’Rielly argued that muni broadband, promoted by the >> evil Wheeler, presented a “particularly ominous threat to the First >> Amendment”, citing TOS language against hate speech and threats. >> >> https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-354770A1.pdf >> <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-354770A1.pdf> >> >> https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/bj49j8/fcc-falsely-claims-community-broadband-an-ominous-threat-to-the-first-amendment >> >> <https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/bj49j8/fcc-falsely-claims-community-broadband-an-ominous-threat-to-the-first-amendment> >> >> >> >> From: AF <[email protected] <>> On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh >> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 1:47 PM >> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected] <>> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS >> >> Michael O’Rielly absolutely positively thinks it’s a fantastic idea. >> >> The really scary part is that he thinks it’s better for private industry to >> own it, since he can’t trust future FCC commissioners. He’s that guy that >> won’t date a girl that would go out with a guy like him. >> >> Mark >> >> >>> On Oct 31, 2018, at 12:06 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected] <>> wrote: >>> >>> " On the other hand, they get rewarded for carrying spectrum as an asset on >>> their balance sheet." >>> >>> This is the most disgusting thing about the American auctioning system >>> right now. >>> >>> Who in their right minds thought it was a good idea to just auction a >>> finite resource to the highest bidder? Why isn't a use it or lose it system >>> enforced, or at the very least a system like we will see in CBRS? It all >>> seems like such a sham that gets propped up continuously. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:42 AM Ken Hohhof <[email protected] <>> wrote: >>>> It’s going to be interesting, I wonder why the carriers would pay anywhere >>>> near the kind of money for CBRS spectrum that they are used to for low and >>>> mid band spectrum, when they can use it for free as GAA. Similar to 5 >>>> GHz. No cost, and opportunistic use for carrier aggregation. >>>> >>>> On the other hand, they get rewarded for carrying spectrum as an asset on >>>> their balance sheet. >>>> >>>> I’m thinking of a scenario where the auction sets too high a minimum bid, >>>> and they get zero bids. Even 10 cents per MHz-POP might be too high, if >>>> it can be used as GAA at no cost. As long as they have an anchor channel >>>> in other spectrum, CBRS is like icing on the cake, nice but not mission >>>> critical, and possibly not worth paying much money to “own”. >>>> >>>> >>>> From: AF <[email protected] <>> On Behalf Of Dave >>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 10:13 AM >>>> To: [email protected] <> >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS >>>> >>>> That makes it easier for the carriers to stomp out the little GAA guys :) >>>> >>>> On 10/31/18 9:50 AM, Joe Novak wrote: >>>>> I think it's more likely that they will have a licensed anchor channel >>>>> and only aggregate 3.65 in the downlink, using different frequencies for >>>>> uplink. Carrier aggregation is a whole different game of spectrum usage. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 9:38 AM Adam Moffett <[email protected] <>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> One thing that was unfortunate about the NN license was that mobile >>>>>> stations had a stupid low Tx power limit. Basically mobile wasn't >>>>>> viable. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is CBRS going to have that type of restriction? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] <> >>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> [email protected] <> >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> >>> <image001.jpg>-- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] <> >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] <> >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
