Lima beans, pickled beets, vienna sausages, spam.  Love lots of things my kids 
and grand kids think are non-foods. 

From: Ken Hohhof 
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 7:51 AM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS

Sounds good, just hold the brussels sprouts and give me the bacon.

 

But then I like lima beans, while most of the world does not.

 

I blame the President for all this hate speech.  Referring of course to 
President George H. W. Bush who hated broccoli.  Article says a kid wrote him 
trying unsuccessfully to persuade him to love broccoli.

https://www.cnn.com/2016/06/25/politics/george-h-w-bush-broccoli-twitter/index.html

 

 

From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 10:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS

 

I LOVE barbecued Brussels sprouts. Especially when there are bits of bacon 
sprinkled over them.

bp<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 10/31/2018 1:06 PM, [email protected] wrote:

  I probably am too in some sense.  I don’t want you picketing my house with 
bullhorns because I choose to eat Brussels sprouts thereby harming the 
asparagus league.  Scares my kids.  Hate speech if you ask me...

   

   

   

  From: Mark Radabaugh 

  Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 1:59 PM

  To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 

  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS

   

  I’m not a huge fan of muni broadband for some of the reasons you cite.   I 
was just amazed that he is all for free speech when it meets his goals and then 
completely against it another circumstance. 

   

  Mark





    On Oct 31, 2018, at 3:53 PM, [email protected] wrote:

     

    I actually agreed with the muni wireless and free speech issue.  He cited 
exact language in the AUPs.  Hate speech is hard to define and muni’s should 
not have that in their AUPs in my opinion.  I also liked that he didn’t think 
munis should be able to compete with private sector.  

     

    I am only a socialist when it serves my purposes, at all other times I am a 
libertarian...

     

    From: Mark Radabaugh 

    Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 1:49 PM

    To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 

    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS

     

    Oh, it’s even better.    

     

    In the same speech where he was railing against municipal broadband on free 
speech grounds he was also busy bragging about how tough the FCC is being on 
those dastardly free speech pirate radio stations.   Because, you know, pirate 
radio is obviously the lowest of the scofflaws.   How dare someone use a FM 
transmitter without a license!    The FCC has managed to take a whole slew of 
incredibly dangerous pastors broadcasting sermons off the air. 

     

    Mark





      On Oct 31, 2018, at 3:06 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:

       

      True.  The Pai FCC and the Trump Administration in general seems 
dedicated to leaving a legacy that can’t easily be undone.  Like selling 
spectrum, or appointing Supreme Court Justices.  They probably see Wheeler as a 
fool whose accomplishments could be undone with the stroke of a pen, and Obama 
much the same.  I’m not being political, and I guess you have to give them 
credit for understanding how the game is played.  If you want a legacy that 
lasts longer than the next election, you have to build it with bricks not straw.

       

      BTW, did you see where O’Rielly argued that muni broadband, promoted by 
the evil Wheeler, presented a “particularly ominous threat to the First 
Amendment”, citing TOS language against hate speech and threats.

       

      https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-354770A1.pdf

       

      
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/bj49j8/fcc-falsely-claims-community-broadband-an-ominous-threat-to-the-first-amendment

       

       

       

      From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh
      Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 1:47 PM
      To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS

       

      Michael O’Rielly absolutely positively thinks it’s a fantastic idea.   

       

      The really scary part is that he thinks it’s better for private industry 
to own it, since he can’t trust future FCC commissioners.    He’s that guy that 
won’t date a girl that would go out with a guy like him.

       

      Mark






        On Oct 31, 2018, at 12:06 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote:

         

        " On the other hand, they get rewarded for carrying spectrum as an 
asset on their balance sheet."

         

        This is the most disgusting thing about the American auctioning system 
right now.

         

        Who in their right minds thought it was a good idea to just auction a 
finite resource to the highest bidder? Why isn't a use it or lose it system 
enforced, or at the very least a system like we will see in CBRS? It all seems 
like such a sham that gets propped up continuously. 

         

         

         

         

        On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:42 AM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:

          It’s going to be interesting, I wonder why the carriers would pay 
anywhere near the kind of money for CBRS spectrum that they are used to for low 
and mid band spectrum, when they can use it for free as GAA.  Similar to 5 GHz. 
 No cost, and opportunistic use for carrier aggregation.

           

          On the other hand, they get rewarded for carrying spectrum as an 
asset on their balance sheet.

           

          I’m thinking of a scenario where the auction sets too high a minimum 
bid, and they get zero bids.  Even 10 cents per MHz-POP might be too high, if 
it can be used as GAA at no cost.  As long as they have an anchor channel in 
other spectrum, CBRS is like icing on the cake, nice but not mission critical, 
and possibly not worth paying much money to “own”.

           

           

          From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Dave
          Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 10:13 AM
          To: [email protected]
          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mobile in CBRS

           

          That makes it easier for the carriers to stomp out the little GAA 
guys :)

          On 10/31/18 9:50 AM, Joe Novak wrote:

            I think it's more likely that they will have a licensed anchor 
channel and only aggregate 3.65 in the downlink, using different frequencies 
for uplink. Carrier aggregation is a whole different game of spectrum usage. 

             

            On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 9:38 AM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> 
wrote:

              One thing that was unfortunate about the NN license was that 
mobile 
              stations had a stupid low Tx power limit.   Basically mobile 
wasn't viable.

              Is CBRS going to have that type of restriction?


              -- 
              AF mailing list
              [email protected]
              http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

             

           

          -- 



          -- 
          AF mailing list
          [email protected]
          http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

        <image001.jpg>-- 
        AF mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

       

      -- 
      AF mailing list
      [email protected]
      http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

     

     


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    -- 
    AF mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

    -- 
    AF mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  -- 
  AF mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com





 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to