You made me think a bit.
Consider 11 GHz.  One 2 mile link and one 10 mile link.  
15’
34’ 
I presume the online tool is calculating 60% of the first fresnel zone.

So half that would be the opposite side of a right triangle.  
arc tan of 7.5/10560 = .04 deg
arc tan of 17/52800 =  .018 deg

So double that for the diameter of the cone based on the distance and angle you 
have almost 1 full degree and a third of a degree.  Pretty small circles.  May 
as well call them a dot when viewing through the camera.  

From: [email protected] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 10:12 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fresnel scope?

I toyed around with this idea last night. I think the angle of view of most 
phones is too wide. Doing the rangefinder math for my iPhone 6s a 1 meter dish 
at 1 km would be less than 4 pixels across at full resolution (4032x3024). The 
5.8 GHz fresnel radius would be 3.6 m or only 52 pixels. Of course, this would 
grow larger if calculated closer to the user—even as the fresnel zone 
shrank—but I don’t have the calculus chops to figure out the ideal size to 
indicate “this area should be clear no matter how far away”


December 18, 2018 8:58 AM, [email protected] wrote:

  I guess you could run a calibration routine where you take a photo of some 
linear feature that exactly fills the frame and tell the phone how far away it 
is and how wide it is.
  From: Brian Webster 
  Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 10:09 PM
  To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fresnel scope?
  Right and since you know the frequency and total path distance, if you used a 
laser range finder to put the spot on an obstruction you would know that 
distance and could calculate the size of the zone at that obstruction distance. 
Might be able to do some Pythagorean math on the other side of an obstruction 
to determine the width of the “hole” through to see if it is wide enough for 
the zone clearance at that distance? This might be a bit too much for an app 
that would work on all phones but I wonder if it would be easier to make it 
work on an outboard camera with the known lenses and rangefinder configuration 
and just use the phone to run the calcs.

  Thank You,

  Brian Webster

  www.wirelessmapping.com

  www.Broadband-Mapping.com

  From: AF [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
  Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 8:40 PM
  To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fresnel scope?

  I guess you could enter the distance of the link and the camera field of 
view. With that you could put some circles on the screen. 

  From: Jeremy 

  Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 6:13 PM

  To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 

  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fresnel scope?

  What about integrating it with one of these laser rangefinders that are 
fairly cheap now? The tech exists to make this product work, but I am not sure 
if there is a big enough market to justify the R&D.

  On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 6:12 PM Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

    The challenge would be to know the distance to the obstructions. 

    From: Steve Jones 

    Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 6:06 PM

    To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 

    Subject: [AFMUG] Fresnel scope?

    Anybody every toyed with making some kind of fresnel scope for installers? 

    Like a rangfinder with a red, orange, yellow, and green opaque overlay that 
you dial your freq and range and it adjusts the rings?

    Having been doing the installers job for almost a year and seeing the "gap 
in the trees" theyve been shooting through, explains alot of the performance 
issues.

    A phone app would be cool cause you could do a field of vision screenshot. 
But i dont know how that could be calculated with much accuracy given the 
differences in cameras 

    Would be really cool if the adjustable rings could be used to identify 
beneficial obstructions for mitigating destructive multipath.

    I cant see the concept being all that complicated, you would know the 
magnification, field of vision and distance from the eye. Making the circles 
adjust like miltiple irises would be a might bit complicated though.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    --
    AF mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

    --
    AF mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  --
  AF mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  --
  AF mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to