https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/01/17000-linux-powered-rifle-brings-auto-aim-to-the-real-world/

On 12/19/18 12:59 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Or carry a rifle...
*From:* Dan
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 19, 2018 1:52 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fresnel scope?

Could try a adding a ridiculous phone lens: https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_c_1_14?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=telephoto+lens+for+smartphone&sprefix=telephoto+lens%2Caps%2C380&crid=2SJCQOX85D6HM&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Atelephoto+lens+for+smartphone

On 12/19/18 12:11 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Yes, with a scope.  The issue was whether or not you could create a cell phone app using the camera.
*From:* castarritt
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 19, 2018 12:11 PM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fresnel scope?
I think you did your math assuming the obstruction was at the full distance of the link, rather than at the half-way point. If the obstruction is at the half way point of a 2 mile link, and the 60% F1 radius at one mile distance is ~7.5', then 7.5' divided by 5.28' (1/1000th of a mile) gives us ~1.4 mrad. Now look through a rifle scope with a mil based reticle, and you should be able to judge the clearance.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:58 AM <[email protected]> wrote:

    You made me think a bit.
    Consider 11 GHz.  One 2 mile link and one 10 mile link.
    15’
    34’
    I presume the online tool is calculating 60% of the first fresnel
    zone.
    So half that would be the opposite side of a right triangle.
    arc tan of 7.5/10560 = .04 deg
    arc tan of 17/52800 =  .018 deg
    So double that for the diameter of the cone based on the distance
    and angle you have almost 1 full degree and a third of a degree. 
    Pretty small circles.  May as well call them a dot when viewing
    through the camera.
    *From:* [email protected]
    *Sent:* Wednesday, December 19, 2018 10:12 AM
    *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fresnel scope?
    I toyed around with this idea last night. I think the angle of
    view of most phones is too wide. Doing the rangefinder math for
    my iPhone 6s a 1 meter dish at 1 km would be less than 4 pixels
    across at full resolution (4032x3024). The 5.8 GHz fresnel radius
    would be 3.6 m or only 52 pixels. Of course, this would grow
    larger if calculated closer to the user—even as the fresnel zone
    shrank—but I don’t have the calculus chops to figure out the
    ideal size to indicate “this area should be clear no matter how
    far away”


    December 18, 2018 8:58 AM, [email protected] wrote:

        I guess you could run a calibration routine where you take a
        photo of some linear feature that exactly fills the frame and
        tell the phone how far away it is and how wide it is.
        *From:* Brian Webster
        *Sent:* Monday, December 17, 2018 10:09 PM
        *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fresnel scope?

        Right and since you know the frequency and total path
        distance, if you used a laser range finder to put the spot on
        an obstruction you would know that distance and could
        calculate the size of the zone at that obstruction distance.
        Might be able to do some Pythagorean math on the other side
        of an obstruction to determine the width of the “hole”
        through to see if it is wide enough for the zone clearance at
        that distance? This might be a bit too much for an app that
        would work on all phones but I wonder if it would be easier
        to make it work on an outboard camera with the known lenses
        and rangefinder configuration and just use the phone to run
        the calcs.

        Thank You,

        Brian Webster

        www.wirelessmapping.com <http://www.wirelessmapping.com>

        www.Broadband-Mapping.com

        *From:*AF [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
        *Chuck McCown
        *Sent:* Monday, December 17, 2018 8:40 PM
        *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fresnel scope?

        I guess you could enter the distance of the link and the
        camera field of view. With that you could put some circles on
        the screen.

        *From:*Jeremy

        *Sent:*Monday, December 17, 2018 6:13 PM

        *To:*AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group

        *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Fresnel scope?

        What about integrating it with one of these laser
        rangefinders that are fairly cheap now? The tech exists to
        make this product work, but I am not sure if there is a big
        enough market to justify the R&D.

        On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 6:12 PM Chuck McCown
        <[email protected]> wrote:

            The challenge would be to know the distance to the
            obstructions.

            *From:*Steve Jones

            *Sent:*Monday, December 17, 2018 6:06 PM

            *To:*AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group

            *Subject:*[AFMUG] Fresnel scope?

            Anybody every toyed with making some kind of fresnel
            scope for installers?

            Like a rangfinder with a red, orange, yellow, and green
            opaque overlay that you dial your freq and range and it
            adjusts the rings?

            Having been doing the installers job for almost a year
            and seeing the "gap in the trees" theyve been shooting
            through, explains alot of the performance issues.

            A phone app would be cool cause you could do a field of
            vision screenshot. But i dont know how that could be
            calculated with much accuracy given the differences in
            cameras

            Would be really cool if the adjustable rings could be
            used to identify beneficial obstructions for mitigating
            destructive multipath.

            I cant see the concept being all that complicated, you
            would know the magnification, field of vision and
            distance from the eye. Making the circles adjust like
            miltiple irises would be a might bit complicated though.

            
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            --
            AF mailing list
            [email protected]
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

            --
            AF mailing list
            [email protected]
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------

        --
        AF mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        --
        AF mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- AF mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to