Yeah I wanted to mention that when I started reading the thread. Personally IP67 is not as important to me as simply being "rain proof", and I have learned to have more faith in outdoor devices that have a drain on the bottom rather than ones that try to be perfectly sealed.  If you've been at this long enough then at some point you've unscrewed a cable gland and had all the trapped water pour out.

I also had a lot of warm fuzzy feelings for the 5 minute upgrade by snapping a new SM on the same dish and same POE.

However, there could have been a big customer whispering (or screaming) in Cambium's ear that they needed an IP67 SM.

-Adam


On 2/21/2019 3:23 PM, castarritt wrote:
I've seen a few used Force 200 radios come back from collection with a broken tab on the cover.  Also, we've lost a number of Canopy radios over the years when rain got into them after the pole blew over or a customer/competitor left it laying on the ground, so I'm all for a bit more installation work to get the IP67 protection.

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Mathew Howard <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    It looks like the 450b uses pretty much the same dish as the ePMP
    Force 200... I wonder why they went with that goofy gland and bolt
    on cover instead of just doing a snap on cover like on the ePMP.

    I agree that the naming is stupid - they're doing the same thing
    with the ePMP line now, with the Force 300-25 and Force 300-16
    being the equivalent of the Force 200 and Force 180. The old way
    was easier...

    On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:49 AM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        My complaint is not about the integral dish, but the specific
        implementation of the cover and gland.  The 450d was not a
        problem. The 450b mid gain is not a problem.  Naming them both
        450b was stupid though.

        BTW, note that it’s not really 25 dBi, didn’t they finally
        fess up and change the spec sheet to say 23 dBi?

        I also quibble with the characterization as “cheapo” and
        keeping costs down.  Depending on which license key you were
        buying on the 450 SM, the cost ends up being about the same as
        the previous SM plus a reflector dish. Of course if you are
        replacing FSK or 430, you already have the dish, and now you
        have to remove and replace it rather than taking 2 minutes to
        pop in a new SM without even needing to realign.

        I’m waiting for the first time we have to replace a 450b high
        gain due to something like lightning damage.  That would mean
        removing and replacing the radome, which BTW is almost
        impossible in cold weather, I have actually had to use a heat
        gun to warm them up so they are flexible enough to go on.  So
        I assume now we end up replacing the whole dish assembly and
        realigning.  Not much point trying to save the dish anyway
        since you have to buy the SM and dish together.

        The other goofy thing is how inconsistent Cambium is.  Even
        the two variants of 450b are different, and the other
        frequencies (900, 2.4, 3.65) are totally different.  And of
        course now when we replace a 450 AP the replacement is a 450i
        AP which requires 48V rather than 24V.  There really seems to
        be no master plan, just flavor of the day. The only
        consistency seems to be carry a 13mm wrench and a 5mm hex key
        with you.  Or an electric screwdriver with a 5mm hex bit, or
        your hands will get tired.  My guys complain about how long
        the threads are on the screws for the hated cable cover.

        *From:* AF <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
        *Sent:* Thursday, February 21, 2019 10:04 AM
        *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450b high gain cable gland & cover

        To a point I agree.  Look at how much nicer a 25dbi dish is
        over a reflector+patch radio, though.  It keeps costs down
        (since everyone's doing the cheapo 25dbi instead of trying to
        get by without a bare SM). Gain is good.

        Ubnt Nanostation copied the Canopy idea, mostly.  They moved
        to dishes. Cambium had to "catch up" with the WISP world.

        My perspective may be different though - we almost never
        install bare Nanostations/Force 180/bare Canopy radios. We've
        always had to do reflectors/dishes.

        Josh Luthman
        Office: 937-552-2340
        Direct: 937-552-2343
        1100 Wayne St
        Suite 1337
        Troy, OH 45373

        On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:59 AM Mark Radabaugh
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            It drives me crazy that Cambium continually spends more
            time staring at what other companies have done and trying
            to copy them than looking internally at what made their
            own products the best in class.

            The original Canopy case design was damn near perfect -
            inverted cup that didn’t fill with water.   Easy to remove
            and replace.   Lots of mounting options.

            And now we have lots of little parts to drop.   Reminds me
            of exactly what I hated about WiMax gear.

            Mark



                On Feb 21, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Brian Sullivan
                <[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                I hate it too.  Seems like they should have that
                design for ePMP and something nicer for 450.  =)
                What would be nice is a door with a hinge, so there
                aren't multiple pieces you can drop and ruin your day.

                On 2/20/2019 9:38 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

                    Does everyone hate the 450b high gain cover with
                    the cable gland as much as we do?  Not sure why
                    they felt the need to do this on the high gain but
                    not the mid gain.

                    I wish somebody (Chuck?) would sell an aftermarket
                    conversion kit to make it like the mid gain or the
                    original Canopy SM.  With a snap on cover, water
                    kept out by gravity, and readily accessible
                    alignment tool port.

                    There are other mechanical things I hate about the
                    product, like the screw in the back that you have
                    to tighten ever so gingerly, and the 4 threaded
                    inserts that seem to have manufacturing quality
                    issues like getting covered over with plastic.  Or
                    the occasional feedtube that doesn't quite want to
                    latch into place.  Or how much work it is to
                    convert them to mount on the left side of the
                    pole.  But the stupid cover with the cable gland
                    is an annoyance every single time.

-- AF mailing list
                [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to