What would you like to see?

Mark

> On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:26 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> How about some photos.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Mar 28, 2019, at 6:58 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> If you ever do the experiment again, it would be interesting to rotate the 
>> antenna to see if there’s some kind of sidelobe pointed toward the ground or 
>> something.  Obviously you can’t install it rotated or upside down (unless 
>> you really trust that cable gland to seal against rain), but it would be 
>> interesting to see the results.  Like you said, maybe some component in the 
>> feed horn is blocking the RF.
>>  
>> Cambium is in a better position to investigate this, it’s disappointing if 
>> they aren’t taking it seriously.
>>  
>>  
>> From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh
>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 6:19 AM
>> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [*] corrective optics
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 27, 2019, at 10:11 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  
>> In another thread, Mark Radabaugh posted:
>>  
>> “For your next product….   Corrective optics for 450B high gain CPE!”
>>  
>> Mark, I’m not sure if you were serious, I suspect yes.
>>  
>>  
>> Yes - but I’m not sure what is possible with the design.
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> I know it’s frustrating that the antenna gain is lower than the old 
>> reflector dish, Cambium dropped the number on the spec sheet to 24 dBi, but 
>> I think even that is optimistic, I think it’s about 2 dB less than the old 
>> combo which was supposed to be 25 dBi.  Lower antenna gain is going the 
>> wrong way!  I don’t care if it does have higher xmt power, that does nothing 
>> for the downstream direction.
>>  
>>  
>> Changing the spec sheet to match what they ended up with was a pretty big 
>> cop out when the product failed to meet design expectations.   
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> In calling for corrective optics, do you have any info or even a gut feel 
>> for whether the problem is in the feed or the dish?  Is it as simple as the 
>> dish is just too small?
>>  
>>  
>> I suspect that they managed to block part of the antenna feed horn with 
>> other components.  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> Also, is it just the gain is low, or does the 450b hi gain have other 
>> issues?  Like poor F/B or sidelobe performance or something?
>>  
>> It seems like if the 450b high gain is far away from other surfaces it works 
>> mostly to spec but when mounted in the typical locations near rooftops it 
>> seems like it either picks up more destructive multipath interference than 
>> previous designs or the antenna pattern distorts badly.  For a long time I 
>> thought they didn’t manage to get the feedhorn in the focus of the dish but 
>> Cambium assures me that it’s right.   We are seeing decent performance under 
>> 5 miles but it seems to fall apart much quicker over 5 miles than would be 
>> expected.
>>  
>> We set up a test with the bucket truck and drove it out and measured every 
>> mile to 10 and it came back fine - but that was 50’ in the air with nothing 
>> around.   Yet swapping out standard 450 SM’s with beehive or KP dishes with 
>> 450B’s at >5 miles routinely fails with poor signal.   The difference is 
>> often far more than the 2dB the spec sheets would indicate.   Sometimes it 
>> works if the antenna is well away from all other surfaces like on a tower 
>> but for the majority of installs the swap fails.   Why were we doing that 
>> anyway?  We wanted to start using 5.1/5.2.
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> I know the 450b mid-gain is frustrating because apparently Cambium doesn’t 
>> think a tight vertical pattern is important.  I keep wondering if a top and 
>> bottom flap like on the old 2.4 Stingers would correct that.
>>  
>> Cambium seems to be sharing antenna designs between ePMP and 450, so the 
>> same issues probably exist in the corresponding ePMP products.
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>  
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to