Reminds me of Intel deciding not to sell 5G chips for smartphones and their 
stock goes up, apparently investors feel they dodged a bullet.

 

Or Google Fiber pretty much getting out of fiber.

 

The question “how will this ever be profitable” has a way of clearing your 
thoughts.  Especially when you’re trying to raise money from investors.

 

I assumed SpaceX was profitable and the Internet satellite thing was a Musk 
hobby project funded from the SpaceX profits, but this article implies it was 
the other way around.  Remind me, which of Musk’s businesses actually makes a 
profit?

 

From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 9:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Real threat

 

Visible antennas

Cost per mbps

Latency

 

I will keep my head in the sand.  

 

From: dave 

Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 8:15 AM

To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Real threat

 

LOL... Yep.. 




On 4/18/19 9:05 AM, Bill Prince wrote:

Well, well, well. Reality may be rearing its ugly head... 

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4254917-spacex-backtracking-satellite-internet-puts-future-profits-doubt
 


bp 
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> 

On 4/4/2019 5:21 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: 



Sounds like a job for Space Force. 

Actually, I'm a little confused.  Will these LEO sats be 5G?  What good are 
they if they aren't 5G?  How are we going to get remote surgery and 
self-driving vehicles without 5G? 

I wish these big corporations would make up their minds, do I need a small 
cell 1000 feet away because <reasons>, or do I need thousands of satellites 
whizzing overhead 50 miles up?  Seems like polar opposites, but apparently 
we gotta have 'em. 


-----Original Message----- 
From: AF mailto:[email protected] On Behalf Of Robert Andrews 
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 7:03 PM 
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Real threat 

And one more Indian anti-sat test to turn it all into chaff... 

On 04/04/2019 04:34 PM, Bill Prince wrote: 



So now in addition to Elon and his thousands of satellites, and OneWeb 
with their thousands of satellites, we will now add Bezos and another 
few thousand satellites: 

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-broadband/amazon-plans-t 
o-launch-over-3000-satellites-to-offer-broadband-internet-idUSKCN1RG1Y 
W 

bp 
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> 

On 3/20/2019 10:30 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: 



Oh, no, Elon will be able to market it to all Tesla owners!  And have 
kiosks in all the Tesla stores! We're doomed! 

So I guess what I'm saying is technology doesn't sell, marketing 
sells, and it all depends on who they partner with to actually sell 
service to end customers.  Also of course they are not the only 
company doing this.  OneWeb for example.  SpaceX has the advantage of 
having their own launch service and being able to piggyback on other 
payloads. 

*From:* AF mailto:[email protected] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown 
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 20, 2019 12:09 PM 
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Real threat 

Or is the sky falling? 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Starlink/comments/7zqm2c/starlink_faq/ 



 

-- 
AF mailing list 
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 




 

 

  _____  

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to