I'm confused.  When you talk about static IPs and NAT, are you talking about
your customer's ATA, or the SIP trunk side of your Asterisk box?  Or the
customer side of your Asterisk box?

Surely your Asterisk box has a static IP and no NAT.


-----Original Message-----
From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 7:33 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Gonna need some help please.

I don't recall the symptoms.  We fixed it with the static and having it
ahead of everything.

-----Original Message-----
From: Forrest Christian (List Account)
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 6:10 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Gonna need some help please.

What are the symptoms?

Are you getting call setup requests but no audio, etc?

setting nat=yes and canreinvite=no fixes a lot of these, at the expense of
having to have all of the call audio going through the asterisk box.  Be
aware that this suggestion might be dated since I haven't dealt with an
astersisk setup for quite some time (mine just keeps chugging along wiht
little maintenance).


On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 5:34 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I have an asterisk system speaking to my SIP provider.  One end or the 
> other (or both) do not tolerate NAT.  We for years we have had a 
> Static for the SIP trunks.  And a mix of other statics and DHCP 
> circuits for everything else we do.  So coming from the ONT we first 
> hit a switch and then off to Asterisk, other servers and a RB router.
>
> I am now switching to a /29 for everything.  So the ONT ethernet will 
> first hit a RB2011 iL-IN (assuming it is capable of doing what we 
> need) and then go to our various other servers as well as the Asterisk
system.
>
> I am not a router guy.  I took exactly one Cisco router class probably 
> back in 2003.  I may have upgraded one Cisco router once back when you 
> could buy one license but apply it to multiple devices.  Not sure if 
> they plugged that hole, I imagine they did.
>
> This sounds like it should be trivial.  I hope it is trivial.  But I 
> would rather have the borg take a look at it before I start to try to 
> download the RB manual and go into my autodidactical mode.  Too old for
this crap.
>
>
>
>
> 76.76.254.48/29 routed to 76.76.252.68
>
> WAN IP: 76.76.252.68
> Subnet: 255.255.255.0
> Gateway: 76.76.252.1
>
> Routed subnet info:
> 76.76.254.48/29
> subnet mask: 255.255.255.248
> available IP's: 76.76.254.49-54
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



--
- Forrest

--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 


-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to