Looks like same behavior.

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:45 PM <[email protected]> wrote:

> Wonder what would happen if you set the slave to accept QinQ?
>
> *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
> *Sent:* Friday, August 2, 2019 4:34 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Cambium PTP450b QinQ
>
> I'm trying to set up a 450b PTP link such that the slave end sticks the
> outer QinQ vlan tag on any packets received on the ethernet and passes it
> through to to the master and then onto our network.    The master should
> just pass these packets on.
>
> Of course the opposite should happen in the opposite direction.
>
> I seem to be missing something.    I have VLAN enabled in the radios, have
> the slave port set to QinQ and the master set to Q. The slave is set to not
> accept QinQ frames, the master is.   And the slave has the default port ID
> set to the vlan I want the outer tag to be placed on.   Oh and the
> ethertype in the master is set to 8100 which I think is the default for the
> cisco switches we use across our network.
>
> Is there something I'm missing?  The packets don't seem to be getting
> through, and there are quite a few filtered packets being shown in the
> master and slave end, which makes me think that it's receiving the packets,
> but just tossing them for some reason.
>
> --
> - Forrest
>
> ------------------------------
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>


-- 
- Forrest
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to