according to this website
https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2019-04-05/gps-rollover-global-positioning-system-receivers-satellites/10966218

Then there's Russia's GLONASS, which eschewed the week number and used a
"day number" instead.

It resets every four years, with the next due on New Year's Day, 2020.


On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 12:12 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:

> Sierra Wireless should pay you a consulting fee to help them fix this
> problem.  At a minimum, let you have a copy of the source code.
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Forrest Christian
> (List Account)
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 2, 2020 7:58 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mass GPS issues
>
>
>
> All of the affected modules should be able to be flashed.   Whether or not
> the facility is in place to do so depends a lot on the design choices
> made.  I purposefully have ensured that there is some way to update
> firmware in the field for all of these modules, with varying levels of
> pain.   I'm going to make a educated guess and say that if you have a
> rackinjector in place, there is a good chance you won't have much pain in
> the event this firmware needs to be updated.    The worst case scenario
> will require a cable being physically plugged into the GPS receiver - I
> know this is specifically the case with the SyncBox junior Aux ports since
> there is no other way to get a serial console to the GPS module due to the
> AUX port pinning.
>
>
>
> How much of this is a firmware update vs a configuration change in the
> modules, I can't say for sure at this point.   I think we're heading into
> the speculation category further than I want to do until we have a better
> idea what is really involved here.   The good news is that things are
> progressing.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 6:31 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>
> The crucial question seems to be, do we mark our calendars for 4 years
> from now, midnight Moscow time, New Years Eve 2023?  So we can power cycle
> a bunch of GPS receivers?
>
>
>
> Or is there some kind of retroactive fix that can be applied?
>
>
>
> Or do we have 4 years to physically replace the devices?  If so, with
> what?  I guess it’s not the end of the world to replace a bunch of
> Syncboxes on towers if we have 4 years to do it, as long as we have a
> replacement device available.
>
>
>
> I’d like to think we could log into a Sync/Power/RackInjector and squirt
> new firmware into the attached GPS receiver, but I doubt it.  Same with a
> Cambium UGPS.  Not sure about ePMP.
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Forrest Christian
> (List Account)
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 2, 2020 7:12 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mass GPS issues
>
>
>
> Yes, and it happens a lot apparently.   I.E. it looked weird, but it
> wasn't.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 6:05 PM Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
>
> Was the weird clock update from GPS PRN 29 sent about 20 minutes before
> midnight Moscow time just coincidence?
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Forrest Christian (List Account)" <li...@packetflux.com>
> *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com>
> *Sent: *Thursday, January 2, 2020 6:53:14 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] mass GPS issues
>
> For us, we have only been shipping GPS+GLONASS since late in 2017 or 2018,
> so this is the first GLONASS rollover for us.    Remember this is still
> speculation here, but I am starting to feel like this most likely will turn
> out to be the underlying cause.
>
>
>
> All of us with the issue seem to be running AXN5.1.1 which was built at
> the end of 2017.  This might be specific to that firmware version/build.
>
>
>
> There are lots of GPS modules out there of varying quality, but few which
> are really suitable for 1PPS synchronization.   Believe me, I've evaluated
> enough of them to know.  I even evaluated a GPS module earlier this year
> which was specifically targeted to timing applications (including survey-in
> and single-satellite operation) and discovered that it was far worse
> timing-wise than the ones we're using.  The mediatek based modules seem to
> be a good mix of low cost and really good 1PPS performance.   Pretty much
> any others are multiples of the price.  This is probably why we've all
> ended up using the same modules.
>
>
>
> But if you're looking for a cheap GPS receiver and don't care about 1PPS
> you might end up with something else.    And probably a different firmware
> build.
>
>
>
> TOTAL SPECULATION:  One suspicion I have is that the behavior of the
> device might be related to which constellation it is preferring, because if
> GLONASS is saying 2016 and GPS is saying 2020 (according to your broken
> firmware), then you might find a module which thinks it's 2016 based on
> GLONASS  but is getting these confusing signals from GPS which says it's
> 2019/2020.   An alternate module that is convinced it's 2019/2020 might not
> be happy about GLONASS trying to say it's 2016.   The behavior would
> probably have to be different in both cases and possibly would alternate
> between the behaviors if one was not preferred for some RF reason.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 5:14 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>
> I’m not sure it’s true that only Cambium products were affected.  It
> appears to be more a certain 3rd party GPS+GLONASS receiver module that
> Packetflux uses in their latest production of Syncboxes and that Cambium
> apparently uses in their latest UGPS production.  Are Packetflux sync
> products used to time anything but Cambium?  Probably not.  Certainly some
> other manufacturers must OEM that particular module, you’d think some newer
> auto GPS nav products or autosteer tractors or ICBMs or whatever must have
> gone bonkers.  Even if they only use location data and not time sync or a
> 1pps signal, it seemed like the GPS sats just disappeared.
>
>
>
> Older Cambium and Packetflux products as well as Last Mile Gear CTM-1 and
> CTM-2 seemed unaffected, I assume because they used different, older
> modules inside.  It’s interesting that Nate reports his ePMP APs tracked
> fewer satellites but not down to zero, and recovered without a power
> cycle.  Different GPS+GLONASS module?  Different firmware in the module?
> Inquiring minds want to know.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Matt Hoppes
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 2, 2020 5:42 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] mass GPS issues
>
>
>
> So why didn’t this happen four years ago?  And why were only Cambium type
> products affected?
>
>
> On Jan 2, 2020, at 6:13 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
> li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
>
> The answer to your question is complicated.   The short answer is that not
> in the way you stated it, as there isn't good enough clock hardware in the
> rackinjector to do this holdover, and the current electrical architecture
> isn't set up to permit the generation of a clock internally.   We're
> looking at some options though so you might see something like this in the
> future.    We're also looking at doing a hardware revision to the control
> board to permit a high quality holdover oscillator to be added.    This
> work was underway well before this event, but hasn't progressed to the
> point that there are really any details as to what form this might take and
> when it might happen.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:00 PM Eric Muehleisen <ericm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> A great feature would be for the RackInjector to generate it's own
> hold-over sync if it were to loose GPS. Any possibility of including
> something like that in the next firmware update?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 8:45 PM Forrest Christian (List Account) <
> li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
>
> One note is that on later RackInjectors, rebooting the rackinjector not
> only won't reboot attached devices, it also won't reboot the GPS receiver.
>  This is to permit reboots of the control interface without affecting
> connected device at all.   This includes *most* firmware upgrades.
>
>
>
> So for the later boards, you'll need to reset it on the GPS status page.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 6:29 PM Andreas Wiatowski <andr...@silo.ca> wrote:
>
> Thanks Forrest, let us know what you find. I can confirm that I have done
> the power cycle on the Rack injectors....we have seen the same issue occur
> again...feels like interference.
>
> It has been suggested by some to switch to Autosync+Freerun to avoid loss
> of client use...I guess it really depends on your networks reuse scheme.
>
> <image861500.jpg>
>
> *Internet.**​*
> *​*
> *Phone.**​**TV.*
>
> *Andreas Wiatowski*
>
> CEO/Founder
>
> Silo
>
> *1-866-727-4138, ext 600* <1-866-727-4138,%20ext%20600>
>
>  |
>
> *andr...@silo.ca* <andr...@silo.ca>
>
> *silo.ca* <http://www.silo.ca/>
>
>
>
> <image461146.png>
>
>
>
>
>
> <image041427.png>
>
> > On Dec 31, 2019, at 8:05 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
> li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
> >
> >  [EXTERNAL]
> > Just an update/random informational message, a lot of which is pretty
> obvious from this thread:
> >
> > 1) As is pretty obvious at this point, something happened either with
> the GPS constellation or with the firmware which runs in the GPS module, or
> some combination of those. What many of you might not be aware of is that
> many vendors use the same GPS modules from the same vendor. Generally a
> certain portion of the uGPS, PacketFlux, ePMP all will use the same module,
> along with other vendors. Each of the vendors (including PacketFlux) has
> changed the exact model of the module over the years, for instance the
> GPS+glonass modules are in newer devices, and GPS only are in older ones.
> I'm working through determining whether this is just the GPS+GLONASS
> modules which are affected (it seems like it might be the case), or if it's
> a few different types. Note that because this seems like it might be
> confined to a certain type (or types) of module, that it might turn out to
> be only certain date/model ranges of each type of gear which are affected.
> >
> > 2) Restart of the module seems to clear the issue. For PacketFlux gear,
> anyone with a SiteMonitor or RackInjector should be able to do this
> remotely. In the SiteMonitor, the row on the binary tab is labeled
> something like 'SyncPipe power'. There might be multiple rows depending on
> how many SyncInjector/PowerInjectors you have - this corresponds to the
> power port on each injector, so you'll have to turn off the row which is
> for the unit which the GPS receiver is attached to. In the RackInjector,
> it's a bit simpler since it's just a button on the GPS page.
> >
> > 3) I'm currently working through trying to find anyone who really knows
> what went on here. None of the usual notification locations seem to have
> any data. Probably too early to tell. I might luck out and be able to get a
> GPS constellation recording I can replay here to replicate.
> >
> > One thing which might be helpful is for those of you who log this stuff,
> if you can provide a pretty close UTC time that this occurred, along with
> the approximate LAT/LONG, I might be able to correlate this with a specific
> event.
> >
> > - Forrest
> > --
> > AF mailing list
> > AF@af.afmug.com
> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> - Forrest
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> - Forrest
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> - Forrest
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> - Forrest
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> - Forrest
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to