I’m not sure it’s true that only Cambium products were affected.  It appears to 
be more a certain 3rd party GPS+GLONASS receiver module that Packetflux uses in 
their latest production of Syncboxes and that Cambium apparently uses in their 
latest UGPS production.  Are Packetflux sync products used to time anything but 
Cambium?  Probably not.  Certainly some other manufacturers must OEM that 
particular module, you’d think some newer auto GPS nav products or autosteer 
tractors or ICBMs or whatever must have gone bonkers.  Even if they only use 
location data and not time sync or a 1pps signal, it seemed like the GPS sats 
just disappeared.

 

Older Cambium and Packetflux products as well as Last Mile Gear CTM-1 and CTM-2 
seemed unaffected, I assume because they used different, older modules inside.  
It’s interesting that Nate reports his ePMP APs tracked fewer satellites but 
not down to zero, and recovered without a power cycle.  Different GPS+GLONASS 
module?  Different firmware in the module?  Inquiring minds want to know.

 

 

From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2020 5:42 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mass GPS issues

 

So why didn’t this happen four years ago?  And why were only Cambium type 
products affected?


On Jan 2, 2020, at 6:13 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

The answer to your question is complicated.   The short answer is that not in 
the way you stated it, as there isn't good enough clock hardware in the 
rackinjector to do this holdover, and the current electrical architecture isn't 
set up to permit the generation of a clock internally.   We're looking at some 
options though so you might see something like this in the future.    We're 
also looking at doing a hardware revision to the control board to permit a high 
quality holdover oscillator to be added.    This work was underway well before 
this event, but hasn't progressed to the point that there are really any 
details as to what form this might take and when it might happen.

 

On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:00 PM Eric Muehleisen <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

A great feature would be for the RackInjector to generate it's own hold-over 
sync if it were to loose GPS. Any possibility of including something like that 
in the next firmware update?

 

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 8:45 PM Forrest Christian (List Account) 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

One note is that on later RackInjectors, rebooting the rackinjector not only 
won't reboot attached devices, it also won't reboot the GPS receiver.   This is 
to permit reboots of the control interface without affecting connected device 
at all.   This includes *most* firmware upgrades.

 

So for the later boards, you'll need to reset it on the GPS status page.

 

 

 

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 6:29 PM Andreas Wiatowski <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Thanks Forrest, let us know what you find. I can confirm that I have done the 
power cycle on the Rack injectors....we have seen the same issue occur 
again...feels like interference. 

It has been suggested by some to switch to Autosync+Freerun to avoid loss of 
client use...I guess it really depends on your networks reuse scheme.








<image861500.jpg>



Internet.​
​Phone.
​TV.




Andreas Wiatowski



CEO/Founder



Silo




 <tel:1-866-727-4138,%20ext%20600> 1-866-727-4138, ext 600


 | 

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]




 <http://www.silo.ca/> silo.ca






  

<image461146.png>


 




 

<image041427.png>

> On Dec 31, 2019, at 8:05 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
> 
>  [EXTERNAL]
> Just an update/random informational message, a lot of which is pretty obvious 
> from this thread:
> 
> 1) As is pretty obvious at this point, something happened either with the GPS 
> constellation or with the firmware which runs in the GPS module, or some 
> combination of those. What many of you might not be aware of is that many 
> vendors use the same GPS modules from the same vendor. Generally a certain 
> portion of the uGPS, PacketFlux, ePMP all will use the same module, along 
> with other vendors. Each of the vendors (including PacketFlux) has changed 
> the exact model of the module over the years, for instance the GPS+glonass 
> modules are in newer devices, and GPS only are in older ones. I'm working 
> through determining whether this is just the GPS+GLONASS modules which are 
> affected (it seems like it might be the case), or if it's a few different 
> types. Note that because this seems like it might be confined to a certain 
> type (or types) of module, that it might turn out to be only certain 
> date/model ranges of each type of gear which are affected.
> 
> 2) Restart of the module seems to clear the issue. For PacketFlux gear, 
> anyone with a SiteMonitor or RackInjector should be able to do this remotely. 
> In the SiteMonitor, the row on the binary tab is labeled something like 
> 'SyncPipe power'. There might be multiple rows depending on how many 
> SyncInjector/PowerInjectors you have - this corresponds to the power port on 
> each injector, so you'll have to turn off the row which is for the unit which 
> the GPS receiver is attached to. In the RackInjector, it's a bit simpler 
> since it's just a button on the GPS page.
> 
> 3) I'm currently working through trying to find anyone who really knows what 
> went on here. None of the usual notification locations seem to have any data. 
> Probably too early to tell. I might luck out and be able to get a GPS 
> constellation recording I can replay here to replicate. 
> 
> One thing which might be helpful is for those of you who log this stuff, if 
> you can provide a pretty close UTC time that this occurred, along with the 
> approximate LAT/LONG, I might be able to correlate this with a specific event.
> 
> - Forrest
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com




 

-- 

- Forrest

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com




 

-- 

- Forrest

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to