CMM4 was solid, just awful for management. We are moving to all gas tube, I trust chuck to undersell his products enough that the clamp delay or whatever its called is worth the risk
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:26 AM dave <[email protected]> wrote: > We have a few cmm5 in service and had absolutely no issues with them and > yes pricey for sure but havent went to a site for a cmm5 issue ever. > Cmm4 did what it was designed to do and we still have a couple in > service. If I had learned to ground them properly I would not of had to > replace any of them as with any > thing you put on a tower. > They were of course only 100baseT where CMM5 is GigE. > Ive been looking at chucks Gige APC gas tube surge arrestor for a new > project we have and looks like a good replacement for the APC444HV version. > > I liked the CMM4 for its Outdoor verison and classy nema box that could be > mounted on a tower but cmm5 there isnt any way to do such unless the box is > 3'x3'x12" which is lil too big for my taste at 150' on a tower. > We pay close attention to what the cellcos are doing with their squid and > power/fiber distribution. > > > > On 2/27/20 3:32 PM, Sean Heskett wrote: > > CMM5 is worse than the CMM4. > > and yes the control board for the CMM5 is a Pi > > -sean > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:44 PM Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, the CMM4 was horrible. We still have a few as well. >> >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:38 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> CMM Micro was pretty cool. We dropped the coin for a few CMM4 (still >>> have one NIB) and were sorely disappointed in what a shitshow it was of >>> cobbled components at crazy high cost, half web interface, half CLI, and >>> IIRC there was java involved too. I wont even look at a CMM5 >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 1:26 PM Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Was it the CMM5 that was basically a big metal box with a tiny >>>> Raspberry Pi in it? >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:21 PM Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We use the PacketFlux rack injector - great product and easy to use >>>>> for lots of different equipment types. >>>>> >>>>> We ripped out all of our CMM5s because honestly they are a PITA and a >>>>> very clunky solution. >>>>> >>>>> -Sean >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:09 AM Shayne Lebrun < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> What are the various options for providing sync to a 3.65 450M? >>>>>> -- >>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
