We do,
We are using #14x4 UV rated power wire and using TAC2 SM LC-LC Fiber
for each radio. Each radio also gets Superior Essex Armor Cat6 BBDGE
cable for
Timing and POE in case of 5Ghz.
U could get custom cables made from Best-tronics that have 4 wire#14
with a pair of Fibers. That is my next move is to approach them about
such a solution but for
now we are running them separate. The Tac2 type of fiber has a Kevlar
jacket which is used a lot in DOD.
If your Cat 6 Jumper is over 6' consider using Ground kit. We ground
everything!
We also have a design to re-purpose the CMM4 enclosures using Dinrail
and Packetflux
On 3/2/20 9:29 AM, Josh Baird wrote:
Do you have a solution for fiber+power to each radio? We're looking
at a few different options right now..
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:26 AM dave <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
We have a few cmm5 in service and had absolutely no issues with
them and yes pricey for sure but havent went to a site for a cmm5
issue ever.
Cmm4 did what it was designed to do and we still have a couple
in service. If I had learned to ground them properly I would not
of had to replace any of them as with any
thing you put on a tower.
They were of course only 100baseT where CMM5 is GigE.
Ive been looking at chucks Gige APC gas tube surge arrestor for a
new project we have and looks like a good replacement for the
APC444HV version.
I liked the CMM4 for its Outdoor verison and classy nema box that
could be mounted on a tower but cmm5 there isnt any way to do such
unless the box is
3'x3'x12" which is lil too big for my taste at 150' on a tower.
We pay close attention to what the cellcos are doing with their
squid and power/fiber distribution.
On 2/27/20 3:32 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
CMM5 is worse than the CMM4.
and yes the control board for the CMM5 is a Pi
-sean
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:44 PM Josh Baird <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yes, the CMM4 was horrible. We still have a few as well.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:38 PM Steve Jones
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
CMM Micro was pretty cool. We dropped the coin for a few
CMM4 (still have one NIB) and were sorely disappointed in
what a shitshow it was of cobbled components at crazy
high cost, half web interface, half CLI, and IIRC there
was java involved too. I wont even look at a CMM5
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 1:26 PM Josh Baird
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Was it the CMM5 that was basically a big metal box
with a tiny Raspberry Pi in it?
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:21 PM Sean Heskett
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
We use the PacketFlux rack injector - great
product and easy to use for lots of different
equipment types.
We ripped out all of our CMM5s because honestly
they are a PITA and a very clunky solution.
-Sean
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:09 AM Shayne Lebrun
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What are the various options for providing
sync to a 3.65 450M?
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
