After posting this I seen an article that said they (WFA) was the crusader. 
Wispa seems to be a member of that group as well.
https://www.wi-fi.org/discover-wi-fi/wi-fi-certified-6
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 Tim Reichhart <[email protected]> wrote:
I dont think it was WISPA I think other companies had there fingers in it WISPA 
isnt that big in DC like some of these other companies.



 

-----Original Message-----
From: "Matt Hoppes" <[email protected]>
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]>
Date: 04/23/20 10:14
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New unlicensed spectrum

So did WISPA make this happen?  Or was it the millions these companies dropped 
that made it happen?
On Apr 23, 2020, at 9:51 PM, Eric Nielsen <[email protected]> wrote:


The primary influencers behind the rule change are some small, no-name 
companies like Google, Facebook, Apple, Broadcom. I doubt you've heard of them. 
They're interested in unlicensed 6GHz for the indoor low power (WiFi6) usage.
I'm certain they've dropped millions lobbying for this.

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 9:45 PM TJ Trout <[email protected]> wrote:

There must be some ulterior motive here there is no way that the FCC out of the 
goodness of their heart provided more unlicensed spectrum to the common 
man/small business. 
So the question is who can utilize this spectrum?
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020, 6:35 PM Tim Hardy <[email protected]> wrote:

FCC has total authority over these bands.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 9:29 PM Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]> 
wrote:

How can the FCC make spectrum available for un-licensed without an act of 
Congress?

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:30 PM Erich Kaiser <[email protected]> 
wrote:

yes you are right.

Erich Kaiser
North Central [email protected]: 815-570-3101




On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:12 PM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:


More like 4.9 to 7.

 

From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Erich Kaiser
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:35 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New unlicensed spectrum

 

Two of the UNII  bands are heavily used for licensed PTP and I mean heavily, so 
really if the AFC system works correctly most of the spectrum proposed will 
likely be unuseable outdoor.  I feel like from a reliability standpoint it will 
be tough to count on a system that uses AFC in general.   What about the 
Antenna being used on these APs are they going to be able to cover the entire 
band from 5Ghz to 6Ghz efficiently?  Just thinking...

 

 

 

 

 




Erich Kaiser

North Central Tower

[email protected]

Office: 815-570-3101

 

 

 

 

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:24 PM Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:


from Fred Goldstein via the wispa list:

 

"There are really two different types of devices approved today. A Standard 
Power device, allowed +36 dBm EIRP, must communicate daily with an AFC that 
determines what frequencies are available at its location. It must have 
geolocation. (We are waiting to see the final Order to see how the "client AP" 
is handled.) The rules for the AFC are reasonably conservative, so the licensed 
PtP users are generally pretty happy with it. And a whole bunch of companies 
have already been working on AFCs.


The Low Power Indoor device, on the other hand, does not require AFC. It is 
limited to indoor use only (must have mains power, may not be weatherproof, 
must be labeled) and is allowed +30 dBm EIRP (clients +24 dBm). Since those can 
use any frequency, the incumbents are a wee bit concerned. But between building 
entry losses (pretty high at 6 GHz) and the directionality of the FS dishes, 
harmful interference is unlikely. That is likely to be a volume market for 
Wi-Fi 6e. The higher-end business stuff, and ours, will be standard power.

The FNPRM asks about Very Low Power outdoor operation without AFC. Like cell 
phones and small hotspots. It also asks about higher power for AFC-controlled 
devices."

 

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:07 PM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> wrote:


Yep...lots of buzz from this

 

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020, 3:47 PM Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:


WISPA said they are waiting for them to release the order.  they are hoping 
it's 36db...there's a chance it's only 30db.

 

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 3:42 PM Tim Withrow via AF <[email protected]> wrote:


I learned that the FCC approved 1200Mhz of unlicensed spectrum in 6 Gigahertz 
today.

any idea what Eirp they approved for fixed wireless?

--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com





--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

--
Eric Nielsen
571-508-7409
[email protected]

--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to