It’s all bluster. Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 14, 2020, at 8:10 PM, Darin Steffl <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com> wrote: > > > I don't think the gun nuts and militiamen stand a chance against the national > guard if they wanna rebel and spill blood over trump losing the election fair > and square. > >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 8:33 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Apathy only works when stupidity isnt fed, scotus needs to shut off the >> feedmill. It no secret I dabble in right wing extremism, even though I'm a >> statist. What people in those circles talk about scares me, and I like >> violence >> >>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 8:27 PM Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I think you underestimate the apathy of most Americans >>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 4:55 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> Scotus is unique in that they arent elected, they ha e a wide berth of >>>> discretion, they are the literal last line prior to violent engagement. >>>> So, say the feds want to add a tea tax on Massachusetts. Massachusetts >>>> says hey, I'm harmed by this. Without a hearing the court says, nope, no >>>> merit. Massachusetts says, hey now, we really think you should hear us out. >>>> Discretion being the key. >>>> >>>> We are at the point of a harbor being a tea kettle in close to 40 million >>>> of the most heavily armed people on the planets minds . Whether what they >>>> think is real, or make believe, it is what it is, and their communications >>>> have been forced out of the public's surveillance, so you never know what >>>> they're going to do next. They're not the kind who wear black clothes, >>>> masks, and disappear right after they do something cowardly like beat an >>>> old man in a wheelchair. They also believe the italian guy pretending to >>>> be latino wasnt kidding. >>>> >>>> Either way >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 4:19 PM Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> I'm not exactly clear as to the train of thought, or even what case/issue >>>>> the SC should hear out. The "case" argued in public is nothing like >>>>> anything presented in any court. It isn't like Trump's lawyers weren't >>>>> given an opportunity. Q. Are you alleging fraud? A. No. Well OK >>>>> then. You can't then go to the PA supreme court and allege fraud. When >>>>> the PA supreme court declines to let you, you can't go to the SC and do >>>>> the same. They will rightly tell you to pound sand. This basic script >>>>> played out over and over again. >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 3:49 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> If I'm following Steve's train of thought: he's saying giving the issue >>>>>> a day in court might convince some people that justice was done more >>>>>> effectively than simply dismissing the case. An independent judiciary >>>>>> shouldn't have to consider political angles like that. The cases are >>>>>> being dismissed because they lack standing and/or lack merit. If that >>>>>> doesn't convince people, then neither would taking the case to court and >>>>>> losing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
