Brad Parscale did an amazing job of doing this (re getting people out from under their rocks). Killer voter identification and turnout operation. Pretty much done the same way you would run a local election except with lots of data and on a national level. They knew their voters and they knew they were going to turn out. The problem was that they thought they were expanding their universe while the Democrats were working with the same universe. Classic mistake. That's not to say the Dems ran a good operation, it was crap, but Trump's dislike numbers are so high he drove turnout of people to vote against him. If the Democrats were smart they would put AOC in charge for 2022. She knows how to run a campaign.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 1:13 PM Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with that. While many (most?) commenters are marveling at the huge > voter turnout, it should be noted that an approximate 80 million chose to > sit out this election. > > There is probably an opportunity in there somewhere for anyone who can > figure out how to get these people out from under their rocks. > > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 12/14/2020 6:26 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote: > > I think you underestimate the apathy of most Americans > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 4:55 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Scotus is unique in that they arent elected, they ha e a wide berth of >> discretion, they are the literal last line prior to violent engagement. So, >> say the feds want to add a tea tax on Massachusetts. Massachusetts says >> hey, I'm harmed by this. Without a hearing the court says, nope, no merit. >> Massachusetts says, hey now, we really think you should hear us out. >> Discretion being the key. >> >> We are at the point of a harbor being a tea kettle in close to 40 million >> of the most heavily armed people on the planets minds . Whether what they >> think is real, or make believe, it is what it is, and their communications >> have been forced out of the public's surveillance, so you never know what >> they're going to do next. They're not the kind who wear black clothes, >> masks, and disappear right after they do something cowardly like beat an >> old man in a wheelchair. They also believe the italian guy pretending to be >> latino wasnt kidding. >> >> Either way >> >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 4:19 PM Carl Peterson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm not exactly clear as to the train of thought, or even what >>> case/issue the SC should hear out. The "case" argued in public is nothing >>> like anything presented in any court. It isn't like Trump's >>> lawyers weren't given an opportunity. Q. Are you alleging fraud? A. >>> No. Well OK then. You can't then go to the PA supreme court and allege >>> fraud. When the PA supreme court declines to let you, you can't go to the >>> SC and do the same. They will rightly tell you to pound sand. This basic >>> script played out over and over again. >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 3:49 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> If I'm following Steve's train of thought: he's saying giving the issue >>>> a day in court might convince some people that justice was done more >>>> effectively than simply dismissing the case. An independent judiciary >>>> shouldn't have to consider political angles like that. The cases are being >>>> dismissed because they lack standing and/or lack merit. If that doesn't >>>> convince people, then neither would taking the case to court and losing >>>> it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
