No but it seems to be a philosophy that is getting pushed by some.  I think it 
would harm the students.  

From: Adam Moffett 
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 11:48 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT possibly political

This course seems stupid.  The original context is the Oregon DOE newsletter 
provided a link to it.  

On the one hand, the DOE is not forcing any teachers to take this course.  On 
the other hand I don't understand why they would even suggest it.  On the 
other-other hand, I don't think we need to flip about it.  This is not an 
actual math curriculum.




On 2/12/2021 1:24 PM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote:

  Yeah, that is what got me too.  We all know there are a bunch of ways to 
arrive at the right answer.  But in math, most of the time there is one and 
only one right answer.  Or in the cases of roots, you can have two right 
elements of the solution but you need both of them to constitute the one right 
answer.  

  From: Mathew Howard 
  Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 11:17 AM
  To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT possibly political

  I think this quote pretty much tells you all you need to know: "Upholding the 
idea that there are always right and wrong answers perpetuate objectivity as 
well as fear of open conflict."

  If they were talking about teaching different methods of arriving at the 
correct answer, that's a fair discussion. I think it's probably true that there 
are differences in the way individual's brains work that make some methods work 
better for some people than others (although I seriously doubt that has 
anything to do with race, but it could very well be related to cultural and 
linguistic background), so there's a reasonable argument for saying that we 
should look at different methods of arriving at the correct answer, but I'm 
pretty sure that math is one area where there is in fact always a right and 
wrong answer.


  On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:54 AM Cameron Crum <[email protected]> wrote:

    Well if that doesn't spell it out for you, I don't know what does. I was 
half kidding in my response earlier, but looks like it was spot on now. We are 
doomed if this crap is allowed to proceed. 

    On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:48 AM Chuck McCown via AF <[email protected]> 
wrote:

      
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/oregon-math-course-racism-white-supremacy-teachers
      https://www.foxnews.com/us/oregon-education-math-white-supremacy

      From: Carl Peterson 
      Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 10:18 AM
      To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT possibly political

      Not sure of your source but I think you misunderstand.   

      
https://www.mathnasium.com/littleton-news-when-one-correct-math-answer-is-not-enough


      "Reframing the above problem to encourage divergent thinking might look 
something like this:
      “Find the sum of 32 + 5 and then create more equations that have the same 
sum.”

      Theoretically, someone could keep thinking about this problem forever and 
generate infinite correct answers."








      On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:32 AM Chuck McCown via AF <[email protected]> 
wrote:

        Just read of a push to teach a “new math” the encourages multiple 
“correct answers” to math problems and eliminates “show your work”.  Supposedly 
cleanses math teaching from institutional racism.

        OK, irrespective of your genetics, heritage, cultural backgropund and 
gender choices, if I tell an employee to go read the sequentials off of a reel 
of cable and tell me how much is left, they better get one frigging answer, the 
one and only correct answer.  

        So I am an old fat entitled unwoke white guy.  By some accounts 
automatically racist.  I don’t feel that way, but again I am unwoke (whatever 
in the hell that means)  so I wouldn’t know.  

        I simply don’t get how getting the one and only right answer in math 
class is institutional racism.  Can you imagine someone that came up through 
schools that allow this trying to get into an engineering program?  Now who is 
suppressing whom...
        -- 
        AF mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



      -- 

      Carl Peterson


      PORT NETWORKS

      401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553

      Baltimore, MD 21202

      (410) 637-3707 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      -- 
      AF mailing list
      [email protected]
      http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

      -- 
      AF mailing list
      [email protected]
      http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

    -- 
    AF mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  -- 
  AF mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


   


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to