I never did get to use the 450m. On 450i you could connect sync on the ethernet port and then also connect a CnPulse (or packetflux equivalent?) to the Aux port so you’d have a backup sync source. If you can still do both I would do both.
From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2023 11:54 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m 3ghz sync with packetflux rackinjector The 450m 3ghz ignores any power on the port so it is perfectly safe to provide PoE+sync to the radio. The power needs to be there to ensure reliable transmission of the sync signal. So yes, use that board, provide either +48v or -48V on that port, and the radio will be perfectly happy to get sync from the ethernet port while getting its power from the power port. On Sun, Jan 29, 2023, 8:04 PM lists gogebicrange.net <http://gogebicrange.net> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: I would think this has been covered in the past but I didn’t find it with a search of my old emails so… When working with the 450m 3ghz AP’s , powering with DC and carrying data on ethernet. How does one provide sync from a Packetflux RackInjector? I assume that you just provide it with the most modern card they are offering (Power Injection for Cambium Sync Board) by sending the POE + sync up the ethernet data cable that is already in use. BUT I don’t want to send a POE up that cable since the 3ghz wont power over ethernet and the unit is already DC powered without asking. Is anyone using Packetflux RackInjector to provide the sync on the 3ghz APs with this configuration? Thank, Brandon -- AF mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
