I figure I've told enough people to do this that I would have bought a few radios by now if it released the smoke.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023, 9:48 AM Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > It took a lot of faith in forrest to do this. There was no magic smoke > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2023, 11:00 PM Forrest Christian (List Account) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> The 450m 3ghz ignores any power on the port so it is perfectly safe to >> provide PoE+sync to the radio. The power needs to be there to ensure >> reliable transmission of the sync signal. >> >> So yes, use that board, provide either +48v or -48V on that port, and >> the radio will be perfectly happy to get sync from the ethernet port while >> getting its power from the power port. >> >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023, 8:04 PM lists gogebicrange.net < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I would think this has been covered in the past but I >>> didn’t find it with a search of my old emails so… >>> >>> >>> >>> When working with the 450m 3ghz AP’s , powering with DC and carrying >>> data on ethernet. How does one provide sync from a Packetflux RackInjector? >>> I assume that you just provide it with the most modern card they are >>> offering (*Power Injection for Cambium Sync Board) **by sending the POE >>> + sync up the ethernet data cable that is already in use. BUT I don’t want >>> to send a POE up that cable since the 3ghz wont power over ethernet and the >>> unit is already DC powered without asking. * >>> >>> >>> >>> *Is anyone using Packetflux RackInjector to provide the sync on the 3ghz >>> APs with this configuration?* >>> >>> >>> >>> *Thank,* >>> >>> *Brandon* >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
