(this was fuller)

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Animal Farm 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 12:20 AM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] spam


  --- [ %(original_sender)s wrote ]
  -----------------------------------

  Saw most of the messages today come in delayed and out of order.  Will see 
what tomorrow and the next day brings...
  I'm not going anywhere. :)

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Animal Farm 
    To: [email protected] 
    Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 11:10 AM
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] spam


    --- [ Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote ]
    -----------------------------------
    We are not seeing a delay on any of Outlook, or Gmail or AOL accounts that 
I have subscribed to the list.

    Doesn't mean something isn't happening.

    Understand, that we FULLY expected that not 100% of everything would be 
perfect when we flipped the switch.  Experience would tell me that patience and 
persistence to work through any unforeseen issues is what it takes to do a 
migration like this.  Waving a magic wand was not an option :)

    Paul

    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
    Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 12:06 PM
    To: Paul McCall
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] spam

    --- [ "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote ]
    -----------------------------------
    I don't see a delay.  Does your mailserver greylist?

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Animal Farm
    Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 11:01 AM
    To: Ken Hohhof
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] spam 

    --- [ "George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)" <[email protected]> wrote ]
    -----------------------------------
    Plus messages are extremely delayed. And I'll get replies to stuff before I 
see my own post.

    Oh, I see Amazon list serv is Mailman. Maybe there's some options to tweak?

    On 9/15/2014 10:49 AM, Animal Farm wrote:
    > --- [ "George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)" <[email protected]> wrote ]
    > -----------------------------------
    > Thunderbird, which only looks at the thread headers. I believe Gmail 
    > figures it out by subject as well as the thread header. And I don't 
    > really want to move my list subscriptions to my Google Apps email.
    >
    > It looks like the first message of a new thread/subject does not have 
    > any Thread headers. The message Ken sent a little while ago about 
    > surge suppression between a SyncInjector and SyncPipe did not have 
    > thread headers. But any replies seem to get the them. Nope, I take 
    > that back. The two replies to the Official Announcement subject from 
    > Jaime and Forrest do not have thread headers. Is the client stripping 
    > them, or is it the list server? Seems it's the list server because 
    > that's the only thing that changed. Sorry to be a PITA, but this is 
    > highly annoying.
    >
    > On 9/15/2014 10:09 AM, Animal Farm wrote:
    >> --- [ Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote ]
    >> -----------------------------------
    >> George,
    >>
    >> What client are you using that would seem to not be working right 
    >> with threads?  I only use Outlook and Gmail and it seems to be 
    >> working right for both of those.
    >>
    >> Paul
    >>
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
    >> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 11:06 AM
    >> To: Paul McCall
    >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] spam
    >>
    >> --- [ "George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)" <[email protected]> wrote 
    >> ]
    >> -----------------------------------
    >> Put it back the way it was.... (yes, I know, I read the other thread, 
    >> but I don't have to like it).
    >>
    >> And it looks like threads are broken or the thread ID header is 
    >> nonexistent.
    >>
    >> #IHateMondays
    >> #IDontDoHashTags
    >>
    >> On 9/15/2014 9:50 AM, Animal Farm wrote:
    >>> --- [ Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote ]
    >>> -----------------------------------
    >>> I think some dude named Animal Farm is spamming the list
    >

Reply via email to