The From address  wasn’t the sender on the old list either.  

However, the old list said did say something like this...   [email protected]; on 
behalf of; Bill Prince <[email protected]>  in the from.

Whereas the new list doesn’t show the <[email protected]>.  

For the moment, I believe that we will put that back in the body soon ...   
like this... --- [ Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote ]




-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett via Af
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 9:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments

I think he means that the From address isn't actually the sender of the e-mail. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Paul McCall via Af" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 6:53:09 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments 

Matt, 

I looked at all the threads for the past few hours, and I see who it is coming 
from each time. 

However, it does not show their email address... we can add that back into the 
body of the message I believe. That is how we had it yesterday, but the upgrade 
"undid" that. 

Thanks! 

Paul 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Jenkins via Af 
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 6:24 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments 

Unless you sign your name to the email, there isn't any way of seeing who its 
from. 


On 09/16/2014 03:15 PM, Ryan Ray via Af wrote: 
> Looks way better now. Thanks Paul 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, September 16, 2014, Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]> wrote: 
> 
>> *slow clap* 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- 
>> Mike Hammett 
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>> http://www.ics-il.com 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> 
>> From: "Curtis Brotherton via Af" <[email protected] <javascript:;>> 
>> To: [email protected] <javascript:;> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:34:33 PM 
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments 
>> 
>> I have also fixed the annoying 'Reply To' issue, where it was replying to 
>> the original poster AND the list. 
>> 
>> It now only reply's to the list. 
>> -- 
>> ============================ 
>> Curtis Brotherton 
>> PDMNet 
>> (772) 564-6800 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- 
>> From: Jaime Solorza via Af <[email protected] <javascript:;><mailto: 
>> jaime%20solorza%20via%20af%20%[email protected] <javascript:;>%3e>> 
>> Reply-to: <[email protected] <javascript:;>> 
>> To: Animal Farm <[email protected] <javascript:;><mailto: 
>> animal%20farm%20%[email protected] <javascript:;>%3e>>, Paul McCall < 
>> [email protected] <javascript:;><mailto:paul%20mccall%20%[email protected] 
>> <javascript:;>%3e>> 
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments 
>> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:09:24 +0000 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks 
>> 
>> Jaime Solorza 
>> On Sep 16, 2014 6:43 AM, "Paul McCall via Af" <[email protected] <javascript:;> 
>> <mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;>>> wrote: 
>> 
>>> Guys, 
>>> 
>>> We installed some updates in the middle of the night to fix the FROM 
>>> problem. There a couple tweaks that will be done today. My tech on the 
>>> project is now sleeping as we worked during the night. 
>>> 
>>> PLEASE BE PATIENT. 
>>> 
>>> Paul McCall, Pres. 
>>> PDMNet / Florida Broadband 
>>> 658 Old Dixie Highway 
>>> Vero Beach, FL 32962 
>>> 772-564-6800 office 
>>> 772-473-0352 cell 
>>> www.pdmnet.com<http://www.pdmnet.com><http://www.pdmnet.com/> 
>>> [email protected] <javascript:;><mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;> 
>>> <mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 


Reply via email to