I wasn’t looking at the header info, I was only looking at what we normally see when using Outlook, or Gmail, or Hotmail or AOL. Again, we will continue to look at the entire scope and aren’t trying to force anything down anybody's throat.
At this point though, to characterize the list as "broken" is a bit harsh, IMO Respectfully, Paul -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen via Af Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 11:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments On 9/16/14, 8:14 PM, Paul McCall via Af wrote: > However, the old list said did say something like [email protected]; on > behalf of; Bill Prince<[email protected]> in the from. Pulled a header sample for Bill; I don't agree, it looked like this (see attachment, no "on behalf of"). My educated opinion is that the new list is still broken. ~Seth
