450 is being made to sync with ePMP, by increasing frame duration to match. 100/430/320 will likely see no new changes. This is what I got from an ePMP roadshow.
-----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof via Af Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 2:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy I am guessing if anything, you will see Canopy (or at least 450) sync with ePMP/320. Seems like it would be easier to make the FPGA based radio use a longer frame than to make the Atheros based radio use a shorter frame. I'm sure they already tried that. -----Original Message----- From: Bill Prince via Af Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy George, you ought to be all over that new Proxim WORP stuff like white on rice. They claim that it will sync with Canopy. bp On 9/17/2014 10:41 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af wrote: > Is that 2.4 or 5GHz? A couple weeks ago someone asked why the 2.4 AP > sector is slant and the integrated SMs are H/V. Cambium responded with > an explanation, something about the SM detecting phases and doing its thing. > > Definitely looks like a Laird/Pac feed design. That has to be a pain > to weather seal. > > When they get these things to sync with Canopy and get the PTP latency > down, then I'll buy some. > > On 9/17/2014 9:22 AM, Greg Osborn via Af wrote: >> We received our first shipment of ePMP Force 100's yesterday. >> Pretty beefy at 10 lbs. Quite a curious angle on the feed horn >> N-type connections. >> It would lead you to believe the antenna system is dual slant. All >> the specs say H&V. > >
