Is the WORP stuff any good?
On Sep 17, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > I am guessing if anything, you will see Canopy (or at least 450) sync with > ePMP/320. Seems like it would be easier to make the FPGA based radio use a > longer frame than to make the Atheros based radio use a shorter frame. I'm > sure they already tried that. > > -----Original Message----- From: Bill Prince via Af > Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:03 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy > > George, you ought to be all over that new Proxim WORP stuff like white > on rice. They claim that it will sync with Canopy. > > > bp > > On 9/17/2014 10:41 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af wrote: >> Is that 2.4 or 5GHz? A couple weeks ago someone asked why the 2.4 AP sector >> is slant and the integrated SMs are H/V. Cambium responded with an >> explanation, something about the SM detecting phases and doing its thing. >> >> Definitely looks like a Laird/Pac feed design. That has to be a pain to >> weather seal. >> >> When they get these things to sync with Canopy and get the PTP latency down, >> then I'll buy some. >> >> On 9/17/2014 9:22 AM, Greg Osborn via Af wrote: >>> We received our first shipment of ePMP Force 100's yesterday. Pretty >>> beefy at 10 lbs. Quite a curious angle on the feed horn N-type connections. >>> It would lead you to believe the antenna system is dual slant. All the >>> specs say H&V. >> >> > >
