I was told there will be various options coming soon to make all of this
stuff sync. There will be advantages and disadvantages to each way of
doing things, but at least it will work. As far as the aging PMP/PTP100,
I assume it will do 5ms framing because that's what 900 does today, so
it is possible on the platform, obviously with a latency hit, but what
can you do.
On 9/17/2014 4:23 PM, Peter Kranz via Af wrote:
This would be a VERY bad thing for people with PMP450 networks.. Increasing
the frame duration to match the ePMP will double the latency of the 450
platform.
Peter Kranz
Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
www.UnwiredLtd.com
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile: 510-207-0000
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Shayne Lebrun via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
450 is being made to sync with ePMP, by increasing frame duration to match.
100/430/320 will likely see no new changes. This is what I got from an ePMP
roadshow.
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 2:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
I am guessing if anything, you will see Canopy (or at least 450) sync with
ePMP/320. Seems like it would be easier to make the FPGA based radio use a
longer frame than to make the Atheros based radio use a shorter frame. I'm
sure they already tried that.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Prince via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy
George, you ought to be all over that new Proxim WORP stuff like white
on rice. They claim that it will sync with Canopy.
bp
On 9/17/2014 10:41 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af wrote:
Is that 2.4 or 5GHz? A couple weeks ago someone asked why the 2.4 AP
sector is slant and the integrated SMs are H/V. Cambium responded with
an explanation, something about the SM detecting phases and doing its
thing.
Definitely looks like a Laird/Pac feed design. That has to be a pain
to weather seal.
When they get these things to sync with Canopy and get the PTP latency
down, then I'll buy some.
On 9/17/2014 9:22 AM, Greg Osborn via Af wrote:
We received our first shipment of ePMP Force 100's yesterday.
Pretty beefy at 10 lbs. Quite a curious angle on the feed horn
N-type connections.
It would lead you to believe the antenna system is dual slant. All
the specs say H&V.
