Does the new Proxim still use the same Atheros chipsets as everyone else? If 
so, it appears doable to have ePMP match the PMP platform. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Peter Kranz via Af" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 4:23:30 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy 

This would be a VERY bad thing for people with PMP450 networks.. Increasing 
the frame duration to match the ePMP will double the latency of the 450 
platform. 

Peter Kranz 
Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd 
www.UnwiredLtd.com 
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 
Mobile: 510-207-0000 
[email protected] 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Shayne Lebrun via Af 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:23 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy 

450 is being made to sync with ePMP, by increasing frame duration to match. 
100/430/320 will likely see no new changes. This is what I got from an ePMP 
roadshow. 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof via Af 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 2:25 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy 

I am guessing if anything, you will see Canopy (or at least 450) sync with 
ePMP/320. Seems like it would be easier to make the FPGA based radio use a 
longer frame than to make the Atheros based radio use a shorter frame. I'm 
sure they already tried that. 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Bill Prince via Af 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:03 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 100 beefy 

George, you ought to be all over that new Proxim WORP stuff like white 
on rice. They claim that it will sync with Canopy. 


bp 

On 9/17/2014 10:41 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af wrote: 
> Is that 2.4 or 5GHz? A couple weeks ago someone asked why the 2.4 AP 
> sector is slant and the integrated SMs are H/V. Cambium responded with 
> an explanation, something about the SM detecting phases and doing its 
thing. 
> 
> Definitely looks like a Laird/Pac feed design. That has to be a pain 
> to weather seal. 
> 
> When they get these things to sync with Canopy and get the PTP latency 
> down, then I'll buy some. 
> 
> On 9/17/2014 9:22 AM, Greg Osborn via Af wrote: 
>> We received our first shipment of ePMP Force 100's yesterday. 
>> Pretty beefy at 10 lbs. Quite a curious angle on the feed horn 
>> N-type connections. 
>> It would lead you to believe the antenna system is dual slant. All 
>> the specs say H&V. 
> 
> 




Reply via email to