I agree, when it shows up in a major journal things may look a bit more legit. The whole field has a taint so that may be one reason we have not seen peer reviewed publications.
But this is one that keeps coming back again and again. Powdered nickel, treated with special sauce, gives off extra heat when heated. I find the isotope changes listed in the white paper the most interesting features. Something is going on. I would love to insert some nickel filled ceramic rods into my furnace and cut my gas bill by a third. Better than cow magnets on your fuel line... From: Chuck Bartosch via Af Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 8:19 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Booyah, I still believe Having formerly been in the field I'm more than skeptical. Of course, experience can be the bane of innovation. Still, 1.5 MW isn't a low power, low yield, hard to verify production. Whatever the source of the result, it's not an artifact (ie, it's presumably either real or its fraud). The past well-known announcements of cold fusion, as you know, have been either fraudulent or badly done science (as in, the effects were artifacts of poor design, not cold fusion). What makes me most skeptical is this isn't appearing in a reputable science journal, like Physical Review Letters (something like this surely qualify for publication in a high impact journal like PRL). Or...did I miss something? (Not impossible by any means). Chuck Sent from my iPhone On Oct 13, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Kade Sullivan via Af <[email protected]> wrote: You cant get people to buy something without proof it's legit. Of course they need a third party to validate. They would need a bunch of cash to make a big enough reactor for it to actually be useful. You can't just *do* things. It takes time/resources/money, and those dont come along with out validation. Not that I'm arguing the point that it's legit or not, as I have no knowledge of the subject. I'd have to have it independently verified to offer my opinion :D On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Chuck Bartosch via Af <[email protected]> wrote: ...and for years it's been BS. Can you imagine how rich these guys would already be if it were real? If it were true, you really wouldn't need a third party to validate. Just do it and be insanely wealthy. Chuck Sent from my iPhone On Oct 13, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Chuck McCown via Af <[email protected]> wrote: Been following this for years. This is the best paper yet. From: Kade Sullivan via Af Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 7:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Booyah, I still believe 1 gram of fuel produced 1.5 MEGAWATTS of power over 32 days? Am I reading that right? Holy shit! On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Chuck McCown via Af <[email protected]> wrote: http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/191754-cold-fusion-reactor-verified-by-third-party-researchers-seems-to-have-1-million-times-the-energy-density-of-gasoline
