Yeah, the actual hourly production stuck me as not reactor sized to say the least...but also impossible to be an artifact if there's the slightest degree of competency involved. I can't bring myself to say I'm hopeful-but I'd love love love to be wrong here.
Chuck Sent from my iPad > On Oct 13, 2014, at 10:41 AM, Adam Moffett via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > > 1.5 megawatt-hours. I think they chose that number for the shock and awe > value. > > If it was producing the same amount of power continuously over 32 days that > would mean 3.9kw. Similar to some portable generators. They also report net > power production of 2.3kw, which doesn't jive with the 1.5megawatt hours in > 32 days. Apparently some energy input is required to keep it running. > > I remain a hopeful skeptic. > > >> On 10/13/2014 9:44 AM, Kade Sullivan via Af wrote: >> 1 gram of fuel produced 1.5 MEGAWATTS of power over 32 days? Am I reading >> that right? >> >> Holy shit! >> >>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Chuck McCown via Af <[email protected]> wrote: >>> http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/191754-cold-fusion-reactor-verified-by-third-party-researchers-seems-to-have-1-million-times-the-energy-density-of-gasoline >
